Is it rational to considers unknown possibilities and assigns gain to them and then decide, and if so what would be the numbers?
I think it still depends which school do you belong, Bayesian or frequentists. A real frequntist may not assign a probability to a single instance of society! he is either an engineer or not!
I think, when the money you may gain or lose goes way over your possible wealth you will start to think really non-linear (non-rational). but I agree that people with same wealth level will weight risk factor…
Is it really possible to hack all these heavy files on super secret(isolated) computers from abroad?
Is it rational to considers unknown possibilities and assigns gain to them and then decide, and if so what would be the numbers?
I think it still depends which school do you belong, Bayesian or frequentists. A real frequntist may not assign a probability to a single instance of society! he is either an engineer or not!
I think, when the money you may gain or lose goes way over your possible wealth you will start to think really non-linear (non-rational). but I agree that people with same wealth level will weight risk factor…
Is it really possible to hack all these heavy files on super secret(isolated) computers from abroad?