https://xkcd.com/1319/
You should let them eat cake.
Cloud services expose their UI/UX through a web-browser will all of the pain points of running a stateful blob of javascript on the client, talking through a mostly stateless protocol to a "mess of stuff" that aims for…
Good to see that people still have this spirit of rolling their sleeves up and doing something like this for fun. Underneath it there is a very real point about mono-cultures and the increased magnitude of the impact of…
huge if true. meanwhile this bill gates will be remembered for asking his friend epstein how to secretly treat his wife for the std that he gave her.
Some of it is well sourced but the remainder is well sauced.
Amazingly enough we have different words to mean different things. What is going to really blow your mind is that the word for the part often differs to the word for the whole.
No, it is the application of learning and that is why learning is central to the definition tgat you pointed at.
If you place an LLM into a harness, alongside evaluation, feedback and problem decomposition / solution integration - it is still an LLM? There is an LLM acting as a component in a larger system. But that larger system…
> Modern models, when properly managed with a human in the loop, write higher-quality code than humans and introduce significantly fewer bugs. I don't think anybody believes this, and interjecting it into every thread…
Tried it after seeing the comment about it yesterday and loving it so far. Very clean, easy and fast to build. Performance is great, and the minimal UI is a breath of fresh air.
I'm on the Swedish list and I get exactly zero spam calls. As the parent post pointed out it is country specific.
Whether they are or not is irrelevant to the difference- there is still an explicit division between training and inference, with reinforcement of the statistics of the training set.
I think it is uncontentious that we are not designed at all. But to address the intended spirit of the question: are we restricted to output that is a close fit for our training set? I would argue that we are not -…
The tu quoque argument doesn't really work here. LLMs are specifically designed to output either material from their training set or instances that look statistically like it. Humans are not.
If you are relying on live updates to change state in a dynamic language then you are not doing it "surgically", unless there is some other definition that means hitting it softly with a large rock.
Kind of weird how LoC has become a metric for people to chase again.
I don't think you can describe his beliefs using booleans like that: you have to use a numeric scale. It would be be correct to say: Elon would need a hell of a lot of ketamine to believe a colony on mars is a…
Alternatively you may want to be a passive investor using the current rules for index inclusion, rather than having them altered to favor this loss-making trashcan on fire.
That is the ugliest Ferrari I've ever seen.
kind of wild that you think there has been no shift in culture between 1970 and 2020
with a mastercard from a swedish bank that is the experience that i get. all online transactions pop up a page from my back with qr code, this is authenticated through an app that shows me the transaction details and…
Dead code elimination is run multiple times, including after other optimizations. So code that is not initially dead may become dead after propagating other information. Converting dead code into an error condition…
Nobody said one rack. Your entire rant is misguided. He analyzed what it would take to put one rack on one starlink like package in order to build a constellation.
Later in the video he runs through the changes needed for 100kw per rack.
https://xkcd.com/1319/
You should let them eat cake.
Cloud services expose their UI/UX through a web-browser will all of the pain points of running a stateful blob of javascript on the client, talking through a mostly stateless protocol to a "mess of stuff" that aims for…
Good to see that people still have this spirit of rolling their sleeves up and doing something like this for fun. Underneath it there is a very real point about mono-cultures and the increased magnitude of the impact of…
huge if true. meanwhile this bill gates will be remembered for asking his friend epstein how to secretly treat his wife for the std that he gave her.
Some of it is well sourced but the remainder is well sauced.
Amazingly enough we have different words to mean different things. What is going to really blow your mind is that the word for the part often differs to the word for the whole.
No, it is the application of learning and that is why learning is central to the definition tgat you pointed at.
If you place an LLM into a harness, alongside evaluation, feedback and problem decomposition / solution integration - it is still an LLM? There is an LLM acting as a component in a larger system. But that larger system…
> Modern models, when properly managed with a human in the loop, write higher-quality code than humans and introduce significantly fewer bugs. I don't think anybody believes this, and interjecting it into every thread…
Tried it after seeing the comment about it yesterday and loving it so far. Very clean, easy and fast to build. Performance is great, and the minimal UI is a breath of fresh air.
I'm on the Swedish list and I get exactly zero spam calls. As the parent post pointed out it is country specific.
Whether they are or not is irrelevant to the difference- there is still an explicit division between training and inference, with reinforcement of the statistics of the training set.
I think it is uncontentious that we are not designed at all. But to address the intended spirit of the question: are we restricted to output that is a close fit for our training set? I would argue that we are not -…
The tu quoque argument doesn't really work here. LLMs are specifically designed to output either material from their training set or instances that look statistically like it. Humans are not.
If you are relying on live updates to change state in a dynamic language then you are not doing it "surgically", unless there is some other definition that means hitting it softly with a large rock.
Kind of weird how LoC has become a metric for people to chase again.
I don't think you can describe his beliefs using booleans like that: you have to use a numeric scale. It would be be correct to say: Elon would need a hell of a lot of ketamine to believe a colony on mars is a…
Alternatively you may want to be a passive investor using the current rules for index inclusion, rather than having them altered to favor this loss-making trashcan on fire.
That is the ugliest Ferrari I've ever seen.
kind of wild that you think there has been no shift in culture between 1970 and 2020
with a mastercard from a swedish bank that is the experience that i get. all online transactions pop up a page from my back with qr code, this is authenticated through an app that shows me the transaction details and…
Dead code elimination is run multiple times, including after other optimizations. So code that is not initially dead may become dead after propagating other information. Converting dead code into an error condition…
Nobody said one rack. Your entire rant is misguided. He analyzed what it would take to put one rack on one starlink like package in order to build a constellation.
Later in the video he runs through the changes needed for 100kw per rack.