I appreciate the detailed response. It's a very important topic that is often filled with empty platitudes and not enough detail.
this is incredible graph work (despite the bleak subject)
> The Gramsican march through the institutions is complete what in the ever living conspiracy theory hot pot is that > 300 million fully armed and trained Americans not even close > I won the lottery of life, born in…
That makes sense as well, I think it's a nice human perspective. People really are uniquely tired lately.
> the OpenAI comms guy who responded already scrubbed his X account who responded to what?
But distribution isn't the only crime here, obtaining the material illegally apparently is a crime too. And the damn robot can also spit me harry Potter verbatim so I don't know how it would also not be distribution?
Not disagreeing, but I wonder how much you have to fuck up to put a trillion dollar company in trouble. Surely it can't be that bad, right?
The difference is you'll get caught a luddite and hear you're opposing progress if you try to get in the way of AI doing any and everything.
Why would that be more useful than fighting this fraud? Surely the original images would be more realistic than one passed through AI two times.
I think that's a pretty well balanced first analysis of this, considering how much we don't know, the IPO "slots" seem to be the most obvious influence.
you mention wedding ring like it's a bad thing
Nah man that's not it
We liked to pretend that our current technology wave wasn't driven by any ideology at all, so much so that it became a dirty word. But look at these billionaires talking amongst themselves, look at Thiel, look at Musk:…
I've yet to meet anyone outside that likes AI except for manager or when people are pretending for their bosses at work. It became a survival tactic.
what do django do that's contrived in js or say aspnet or rails?
> No diabetic with baseline adult competence is going to drive their insulin-delivery vehicle off a cliff because some app said so. if you can't trust this thing then what is it doing? the implication that people that…
Programmers are the easiest target: they're the group most averse to organizing; their bosses, however, are not.
you're arguing against things that have no material effect. "oh won't you think about adversarial discourse about the most well funded industry in recent history"
is this really the case ? I thought they had given up on fleet
> China arbitrarily traps people in China without any such thing or any due process whatsoever. What makes you think there's no legal process for blocking nationals from leaving China?It's a very common instrument and…
They certainly can.
Oh no the great war crime of _getting called a warmonger_ for bombing children in schools and invading other countries... Your grievances with how you perceive other people opinion of the US are irrelevant when…
> Criticising America is nothing new or subversive. Hunter s Thompson was doing it all these years ago and much more interestingly and on point than anyone on here could. The existence better critique out there is…
Websites could scan your local network covertly up until a few years ago; now it requires explicit permission (like notifications, location, etc)
From "The Attack: How it works", its just checking the user agent string: function a() { return "undefined" != typeof window && window && "node" !== window.appEnvironment; } function s() { return…
I appreciate the detailed response. It's a very important topic that is often filled with empty platitudes and not enough detail.
this is incredible graph work (despite the bleak subject)
> The Gramsican march through the institutions is complete what in the ever living conspiracy theory hot pot is that > 300 million fully armed and trained Americans not even close > I won the lottery of life, born in…
That makes sense as well, I think it's a nice human perspective. People really are uniquely tired lately.
> the OpenAI comms guy who responded already scrubbed his X account who responded to what?
But distribution isn't the only crime here, obtaining the material illegally apparently is a crime too. And the damn robot can also spit me harry Potter verbatim so I don't know how it would also not be distribution?
Not disagreeing, but I wonder how much you have to fuck up to put a trillion dollar company in trouble. Surely it can't be that bad, right?
The difference is you'll get caught a luddite and hear you're opposing progress if you try to get in the way of AI doing any and everything.
Why would that be more useful than fighting this fraud? Surely the original images would be more realistic than one passed through AI two times.
I think that's a pretty well balanced first analysis of this, considering how much we don't know, the IPO "slots" seem to be the most obvious influence.
you mention wedding ring like it's a bad thing
Nah man that's not it
We liked to pretend that our current technology wave wasn't driven by any ideology at all, so much so that it became a dirty word. But look at these billionaires talking amongst themselves, look at Thiel, look at Musk:…
I've yet to meet anyone outside that likes AI except for manager or when people are pretending for their bosses at work. It became a survival tactic.
what do django do that's contrived in js or say aspnet or rails?
> No diabetic with baseline adult competence is going to drive their insulin-delivery vehicle off a cliff because some app said so. if you can't trust this thing then what is it doing? the implication that people that…
Programmers are the easiest target: they're the group most averse to organizing; their bosses, however, are not.
you're arguing against things that have no material effect. "oh won't you think about adversarial discourse about the most well funded industry in recent history"
is this really the case ? I thought they had given up on fleet
> China arbitrarily traps people in China without any such thing or any due process whatsoever. What makes you think there's no legal process for blocking nationals from leaving China?It's a very common instrument and…
They certainly can.
Oh no the great war crime of _getting called a warmonger_ for bombing children in schools and invading other countries... Your grievances with how you perceive other people opinion of the US are irrelevant when…
> Criticising America is nothing new or subversive. Hunter s Thompson was doing it all these years ago and much more interestingly and on point than anyone on here could. The existence better critique out there is…
Websites could scan your local network covertly up until a few years ago; now it requires explicit permission (like notifications, location, etc)
From "The Attack: How it works", its just checking the user agent string: function a() { return "undefined" != typeof window && window && "node" !== window.appEnvironment; } function s() { return…