I was seeing it on Android w/ Firefox. Seems like it's fixed now though. :)
Pretty neat!!! You may already be aware of this, but the page doesn't seem to be formatted correctly on mobile. The content shows in a single thin column in the middle.
You could do this with the :has() CSS psuedo-class[0], though inverted (select a parent that _has_ the child matching a selector). Looks like that psuedo-class has not been implemented in the kuchiki library that htmlq…
Their content monetization policy[0] doesn't seem to prohibit sexual content. I wonder if this was made in response to the previous OnlyFans announcement(s)? [0]:…
What's the difference between that and the current situation (forced to used Apple's payment system)? Isn't Apple just forcing everyone to use what suits them best?
I was seeing it on Android w/ Firefox. Seems like it's fixed now though. :)
Pretty neat!!! You may already be aware of this, but the page doesn't seem to be formatted correctly on mobile. The content shows in a single thin column in the middle.
You could do this with the :has() CSS psuedo-class[0], though inverted (select a parent that _has_ the child matching a selector). Looks like that psuedo-class has not been implemented in the kuchiki library that htmlq…
Their content monetization policy[0] doesn't seem to prohibit sexual content. I wonder if this was made in response to the previous OnlyFans announcement(s)? [0]:…
What's the difference between that and the current situation (forced to used Apple's payment system)? Isn't Apple just forcing everyone to use what suits them best?