animal-husband
No user record in our sample, but animal-husband has activity below (stories or comments). Likely we have partial data — the full bulk-load will fill profiles in.
No user record in our sample, but animal-husband has activity below (stories or comments). Likely we have partial data — the full bulk-load will fill profiles in.
That is what was observed - o1 family models performed the “cheat”, non-reasoning models didn’t.
Text generated prior to a decision to “explain” it is reasoning for the relevant intents and purposes. Text generated after a decision to “explain” it is largely nonsense.
Would be interesting to see the actual logic here. It sounds like they may have given it a tool like “make valid move ( move )”, and a separate tool like “write board state ( state )”, in which case I’m not sure that…
Were that the case, you’d see vegans advocating for eating classically-husbanded animals. But I for one have never seen such a thing. And when I’ve spoken with vegans about this very topic, they’ve insisted that no…