anna-gabriella
No user record in our sample, but anna-gabriella has activity below (stories or comments). Likely we have partial data — the full bulk-load will fill profiles in.
No user record in our sample, but anna-gabriella has activity below (stories or comments). Likely we have partial data — the full bulk-load will fill profiles in.
You are bullying and lying. Please kindly stop bullying and remove comments with lies. Thank you very much.
I am not associated with this other account. You are just making things up about people, papers, and chips.
DeepMind made huge breakthroughs, agreed. AlphaGo beat a sitting go champion, which was very cool. AlphaFold solved a large number of proteins with verified results. Are we clear on this? Hope you are taking back your…
We are discussing AlphaChip in 2024, not AlphaGo from 2016. I don't know much about protein folding (there were some controversies there, but that's not relevant). Neither of these has been related to product claims. As…
Reposting, as someone is flagging my comments. > People in the know are following this topic - big-wow surprise!
Hm... I also had to piece things together and agree that Google PR is pretty slick. The approach had promise 3-4 years ago, but the science seems clear now. Google is avoiding tests on shared chip designs but claims a…
[flagged]
[flagged]
I can tell you get excited by SciFi, that's where Google's work belongs - people have been unable to reproduce it outside Google by a long shot.
Does this make any sense, really? - Define some common words and then let the media run wild with them. How about we redefine "better" and "revolutionize"? Oh, wait, I think people are doing that already...
Dated or not, if half of the criticisms are right, the original paper may need to be retracted. No progress on RL for chip design was published by Google since 2022, as far as I can tell. So, it looks like most if not…
That does not mean you need to pre-train either. Common sense, no?