This patent is not part of google's open pledge: https://www.google.com/patents/opnpledge/patents/ Of course, their "open" excuse is all nonsense to begin with.
Isn't there a way to make the patent open for everyone instead of owned by google? I don't buy the excuses.
In that vast majority of cases, interviewers are expecting the right solution. When I see a question I know the answer to, I pretend to eventually come to the solution to impress fools such as yourself.
Not surprising in the slightest. I work in machine learning and no longer trust most papers I read. A lot of papers have fabricated or dishonest results, and the people who publish these results are often the ones who…
That is malice.
"Do they not want promotions or pay increases at their current jobs before leaving? Usually you have to do good quality work to get promoted." In my experience, algs interviews are far, far more fair than promos. You…
I don't think it takes a long time for people to realize it's all bullshit. Playing the game and being purposely deceitful is the type of behavior that gets people promoted, so that's what people do. To get promoted to…
I once had an interviewer who said my O(N) solution was actually O(2N), so my solution is wrong. There algs interview evaluations are very, very subjective and inconsistent. If places like google actually cared about…
Doesn't have to be a standard IQ test, I would be fine with the test being about algorithms and systems design type questions. Just please remove the biased human component from interviews and use a more standardized…
"ethic group (I assume you used race for this?)" Yeah I mean biological race in the darwinian sense. Some groups have been separated with little gene flow for 100-200K years.
But some races were likely separated for longer than that, so these mutations are likely uneven across populations. Very disturbing if true.
Well I appreciate these interview loops because at least they are still far more objective than big company promo processes when whoever lies the most and forces others to do their dirty work gets promoted. I do wish…
the vast majority of ML/data scientist positions are actually similar to the hypothetical ML engineer position you described.
This patent is not part of google's open pledge: https://www.google.com/patents/opnpledge/patents/ Of course, their "open" excuse is all nonsense to begin with.
Isn't there a way to make the patent open for everyone instead of owned by google? I don't buy the excuses.
In that vast majority of cases, interviewers are expecting the right solution. When I see a question I know the answer to, I pretend to eventually come to the solution to impress fools such as yourself.
Not surprising in the slightest. I work in machine learning and no longer trust most papers I read. A lot of papers have fabricated or dishonest results, and the people who publish these results are often the ones who…
That is malice.
"Do they not want promotions or pay increases at their current jobs before leaving? Usually you have to do good quality work to get promoted." In my experience, algs interviews are far, far more fair than promos. You…
I don't think it takes a long time for people to realize it's all bullshit. Playing the game and being purposely deceitful is the type of behavior that gets people promoted, so that's what people do. To get promoted to…
I once had an interviewer who said my O(N) solution was actually O(2N), so my solution is wrong. There algs interview evaluations are very, very subjective and inconsistent. If places like google actually cared about…
Doesn't have to be a standard IQ test, I would be fine with the test being about algorithms and systems design type questions. Just please remove the biased human component from interviews and use a more standardized…
"ethic group (I assume you used race for this?)" Yeah I mean biological race in the darwinian sense. Some groups have been separated with little gene flow for 100-200K years.
But some races were likely separated for longer than that, so these mutations are likely uneven across populations. Very disturbing if true.
Well I appreciate these interview loops because at least they are still far more objective than big company promo processes when whoever lies the most and forces others to do their dirty work gets promoted. I do wish…
the vast majority of ML/data scientist positions are actually similar to the hypothetical ML engineer position you described.