After years off of it I got back on it because living in NYC it’s a lot easier to find and get invited to events in the arts if you’re on it. I wish it weren’t so. I hate every part of it that isn’t a utility.
Does that apply to quotes from an article? They seemed to be criticizing a second or third degree source for being PR, which feels fair.
Here is what the National Science Foundation has to say about it: > "The decision to de-scope aligns with NSF's wider strategy of a nimbler approach to prioritize support for evolving scientific priorities and emerging…
Is this from Bannon and co.? What is their rationale for being militaristic during a return of Jesus? Wouldn't Jesus not like that very much?
> Ask it if a microservices architecture makes sense for your three-person team and it’ll explain why microservices are an excellent choice. Just tried this. Claude Opus replied “probably not” and recommended a well…
For what it’s worth, Persona claims to not work or interact with Thiel. https://vmfunc.re/blog/persona-2
Did you read it? It does neither of those things. It establishes that Meta is fighting to amend these regulatory bills to push onus onto operating systems and Discord isn’t named once in the OP.
Ehh. In the last corporate PR nightmare I was witness to internally we absolutely tracked return subscribers in our fallout dashboard.
Yep, it is easy to circumvent, and the silver lining of all of this is that regulators don't care. They care that these companies made an effort in guessing.
From the second paragraph: > And the only way to prove that you checked is to keep the data indefinitely. This is not true and made me immediately stop reading. If a social media app uses a third party vendor to do…
From the article > Palantir is working on a tool for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) that populates a map with potential deportation targets, brings up a dossier on each person, and provides a “confidence…
Correction: 31% of the eligible voting population and ~50% of the popular vote. A lot of people did not vote.
After years off of it I got back on it because living in NYC it’s a lot easier to find and get invited to events in the arts if you’re on it. I wish it weren’t so. I hate every part of it that isn’t a utility.
Does that apply to quotes from an article? They seemed to be criticizing a second or third degree source for being PR, which feels fair.
Here is what the National Science Foundation has to say about it: > "The decision to de-scope aligns with NSF's wider strategy of a nimbler approach to prioritize support for evolving scientific priorities and emerging…
Is this from Bannon and co.? What is their rationale for being militaristic during a return of Jesus? Wouldn't Jesus not like that very much?
> Ask it if a microservices architecture makes sense for your three-person team and it’ll explain why microservices are an excellent choice. Just tried this. Claude Opus replied “probably not” and recommended a well…
For what it’s worth, Persona claims to not work or interact with Thiel. https://vmfunc.re/blog/persona-2
Did you read it? It does neither of those things. It establishes that Meta is fighting to amend these regulatory bills to push onus onto operating systems and Discord isn’t named once in the OP.
Ehh. In the last corporate PR nightmare I was witness to internally we absolutely tracked return subscribers in our fallout dashboard.
Yep, it is easy to circumvent, and the silver lining of all of this is that regulators don't care. They care that these companies made an effort in guessing.
From the second paragraph: > And the only way to prove that you checked is to keep the data indefinitely. This is not true and made me immediately stop reading. If a social media app uses a third party vendor to do…
From the article > Palantir is working on a tool for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) that populates a map with potential deportation targets, brings up a dossier on each person, and provides a “confidence…
Correction: 31% of the eligible voting population and ~50% of the popular vote. A lot of people did not vote.