Between Matt Levine and the FT, I saw plenty of damning (or at least skeptical) coverage throughout the entire lead-up.
I don't understand the motivation for using multiple RNGs in the first place. If the game had one global, seed-able source of randomness, would this problem just disappear?
what do you mean? crew-9 launched from the cape, like all crewed missions. in fact, it was the first crewed mission to launch from SCL-40 instead of the usual 39a.
they have Starlink now thanks to laser links btwn the satellites https://www.theverge.com/2022/9/15/23354013/starlink-antarct...
Between Matt Levine and the FT, I saw plenty of damning (or at least skeptical) coverage throughout the entire lead-up.
I don't understand the motivation for using multiple RNGs in the first place. If the game had one global, seed-able source of randomness, would this problem just disappear?
what do you mean? crew-9 launched from the cape, like all crewed missions. in fact, it was the first crewed mission to launch from SCL-40 instead of the usual 39a.
they have Starlink now thanks to laser links btwn the satellites https://www.theverge.com/2022/9/15/23354013/starlink-antarct...