First and foremost it's off-topic. Second, these are the same citations used by those who were pushing for the FTC to sue Google for antitrust, so they have political baggage, third: it's before the company was founded…
Way to hijack the thread with anti-Google propaganda ...
No they're not, its just a cynical PR stunt: http://arstechnica.com/business/2013/08/crypto-experts-blast...
What is really troubling is how many outlets are picking that piece of propaganda as is, with no attempt to even look at the source - both the original text of the motion the people who are spreading the misinformation.
For the umpteenth time to the umpteenth submission, this is not true, Google never said that: sections of this legal motion have been deliberately taken out of context to mislead readers. If anything that quote is about…
This is like the 10th submission of this nonsense: sections of this legal motion have been deliberately taken out of context to mislead readers. If anything that quote is about non-Gmail users and even then it’s in…
As I've already commented on a previous submission of the RT source, this is nonsense. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6208521 Wow, talk about taking things out of context, but I guess this is what you get from…
IMAP. Or search for previous Ask HNs, there are dozen on the topic.
That is a pretty big downgrade in rhetoric on your side: first you were claiming that their business is "surveillance", and that they "sell their users to advertisers" and now that you know better you try to shift the…
I'll avoid making a comment of how NSA talk is hijacking every thread, but I'll attempt to correct your misgivings: Google's primary business is advertising, meaning that like the publishers of yore they sell "space",…
Seems the author is suffering from fanboyism induced blindness. The main points made about Android that make it great have little to do with Google: the ability to set default apps, intent sharing between apps,…
Try "--enable-webgl --ignore-gpu-blacklist "
First and foremost it's off-topic. Second, these are the same citations used by those who were pushing for the FTC to sue Google for antitrust, so they have political baggage, third: it's before the company was founded…
Way to hijack the thread with anti-Google propaganda ...
No they're not, its just a cynical PR stunt: http://arstechnica.com/business/2013/08/crypto-experts-blast...
What is really troubling is how many outlets are picking that piece of propaganda as is, with no attempt to even look at the source - both the original text of the motion the people who are spreading the misinformation.
For the umpteenth time to the umpteenth submission, this is not true, Google never said that: sections of this legal motion have been deliberately taken out of context to mislead readers. If anything that quote is about…
This is like the 10th submission of this nonsense: sections of this legal motion have been deliberately taken out of context to mislead readers. If anything that quote is about non-Gmail users and even then it’s in…
As I've already commented on a previous submission of the RT source, this is nonsense. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6208521 Wow, talk about taking things out of context, but I guess this is what you get from…
IMAP. Or search for previous Ask HNs, there are dozen on the topic.
That is a pretty big downgrade in rhetoric on your side: first you were claiming that their business is "surveillance", and that they "sell their users to advertisers" and now that you know better you try to shift the…
I'll avoid making a comment of how NSA talk is hijacking every thread, but I'll attempt to correct your misgivings: Google's primary business is advertising, meaning that like the publishers of yore they sell "space",…
Seems the author is suffering from fanboyism induced blindness. The main points made about Android that make it great have little to do with Google: the ability to set default apps, intent sharing between apps,…
Try "--enable-webgl --ignore-gpu-blacklist "