Interesting, is the implication that the sampler makes a big effect on both prose style and coding abilities? Hadn't really thought about that, I wonder if eg. selecting different samplers for different use cases could…
Yeah I'm surprised they used that example. The correct (and PhD-level) response would have been to refuse or redirect to a better explanation
In terms of raw prose quality, I'm not convinced GPT-5 sounds "less like AI" or "more like a friend". Just count the number of em-dashes. It's become something of a LLM shibboleth.
https://archive.ph/yBbYn
What is a subagent?
Interesting, is the implication that the sampler makes a big effect on both prose style and coding abilities? Hadn't really thought about that, I wonder if eg. selecting different samplers for different use cases could…
Yeah I'm surprised they used that example. The correct (and PhD-level) response would have been to refuse or redirect to a better explanation
In terms of raw prose quality, I'm not convinced GPT-5 sounds "less like AI" or "more like a friend". Just count the number of em-dashes. It's become something of a LLM shibboleth.
https://archive.ph/yBbYn
What is a subagent?