Hot take, but as long as human dose not need to eat food half of the political problem will be solved.
read a book.
Why is it a reductionism view? A true reductionist will no doubt claim taste won't left as well, at least not as a non-private langauge.
But this is basically reinventing the term "Aesthetics" which is a field that had several centuries of philosophy research about it. Not all of them will agree AI cannot have it. Actually I think it is possible to…
I use a mini amd pc with a disk bay. Surprisingly it is cheaper than many nas, and much more configurable (from memory to ssd) and have a much better gpu. The only challenge would be finding a very good cable that stays…
At this stage. No doubt calculus had plenty industrial benefit.
Cheating is only fully unethical under two radical assumption: 1. School is perfect. 2. With a diplomat from a perfect school, the society's employment process is perfect. I don't think either the definition of perfect…
Wake up, it is open. You can tailor it to your whatever kind of ideology. It is not like Anthropic which will force you to suck Dario's propaganda.
Every site should automatically get its own container. This will break almost all sso when authentication service is at different domain.
Well, maybe because of the two ungrateful college students who dared to write in their essay the following notorious statement: > We expect that advertising funded search engines will be inherently biased towards the…
I thought it should always be common knowledge that there is no way for any organization of 100m people to have one single mind.
It is hilarious to see people from arguable the most polarized political systems in the world believing the evil 1.5 billion people across the sea share one single mind, either a saint, or a devil.
SOME human relationships are the most valuable thing we have. Many (if not most) human relationships in many cultures are just trespassing everyone's boundary via peer pressure. Disclaimer: I am from Scandinavian.
And it is somewhat correlated to my point because?
You speak as if middle of (not even statistically divided but carelessly divided) human opinion groups is neutral. There is something called facts, and we are living in a physical world. Unless you also believe the…
And here is a reddit meme for you https://i.redd.it/eeoo4y00lkne1.jpeg
Read Second Amendment. Also, governments consists of a large amount of human each acting for their own benefit. Assuming they can easily collectively united as a single force to use violence to harm all citizen (on the…
Any one with critical thought should realize government behavior are usually symbolic and does not necessarily try to solve what it claims to (try to) solve on paper.
Given the capability of fable and the shockingly repetitive silly mistakes they made when publishing/updating something, I am starting to wondering whether Anthrophic can afford Fable for everything themselves.
[flagged]
People always conflate this statement. Only government can take "right" from people. Just opposing people don't make them lose their right. Otherwise it is taking away the right to say against what you say.
At 21 century, especially on a topic regarding Europe, I thought we should have long learnt the lesson from how problematic Legal Positivism and naive "freedom" is from Weimarer Republik‘s constitution. In short,…
Feel like could reference how those CAD script languages do it.
Yet a published peer-reviewed research should be against humanity. I am also curious whether such research can bring knowledge that apple don't know, otherwise even it is impressive, there is a level of sadness in it…
Evidently Fable is so powerful that it already allow Anthropic to break Shannon's theory. >We will require 30-day retention for all traffic on Mythos-class models, on both first- and third-party surfaces. We won’t use…
Hot take, but as long as human dose not need to eat food half of the political problem will be solved.
read a book.
Why is it a reductionism view? A true reductionist will no doubt claim taste won't left as well, at least not as a non-private langauge.
But this is basically reinventing the term "Aesthetics" which is a field that had several centuries of philosophy research about it. Not all of them will agree AI cannot have it. Actually I think it is possible to…
I use a mini amd pc with a disk bay. Surprisingly it is cheaper than many nas, and much more configurable (from memory to ssd) and have a much better gpu. The only challenge would be finding a very good cable that stays…
At this stage. No doubt calculus had plenty industrial benefit.
Cheating is only fully unethical under two radical assumption: 1. School is perfect. 2. With a diplomat from a perfect school, the society's employment process is perfect. I don't think either the definition of perfect…
Wake up, it is open. You can tailor it to your whatever kind of ideology. It is not like Anthropic which will force you to suck Dario's propaganda.
Every site should automatically get its own container. This will break almost all sso when authentication service is at different domain.
Well, maybe because of the two ungrateful college students who dared to write in their essay the following notorious statement: > We expect that advertising funded search engines will be inherently biased towards the…
I thought it should always be common knowledge that there is no way for any organization of 100m people to have one single mind.
It is hilarious to see people from arguable the most polarized political systems in the world believing the evil 1.5 billion people across the sea share one single mind, either a saint, or a devil.
SOME human relationships are the most valuable thing we have. Many (if not most) human relationships in many cultures are just trespassing everyone's boundary via peer pressure. Disclaimer: I am from Scandinavian.
And it is somewhat correlated to my point because?
You speak as if middle of (not even statistically divided but carelessly divided) human opinion groups is neutral. There is something called facts, and we are living in a physical world. Unless you also believe the…
And here is a reddit meme for you https://i.redd.it/eeoo4y00lkne1.jpeg
Read Second Amendment. Also, governments consists of a large amount of human each acting for their own benefit. Assuming they can easily collectively united as a single force to use violence to harm all citizen (on the…
Any one with critical thought should realize government behavior are usually symbolic and does not necessarily try to solve what it claims to (try to) solve on paper.
Given the capability of fable and the shockingly repetitive silly mistakes they made when publishing/updating something, I am starting to wondering whether Anthrophic can afford Fable for everything themselves.
[flagged]
People always conflate this statement. Only government can take "right" from people. Just opposing people don't make them lose their right. Otherwise it is taking away the right to say against what you say.
At 21 century, especially on a topic regarding Europe, I thought we should have long learnt the lesson from how problematic Legal Positivism and naive "freedom" is from Weimarer Republik‘s constitution. In short,…
Feel like could reference how those CAD script languages do it.
Yet a published peer-reviewed research should be against humanity. I am also curious whether such research can bring knowledge that apple don't know, otherwise even it is impressive, there is a level of sadness in it…
Evidently Fable is so powerful that it already allow Anthropic to break Shannon's theory. >We will require 30-day retention for all traffic on Mythos-class models, on both first- and third-party surfaces. We won’t use…