Rmarkdown has the better version control story.
Parent is correct — entanglement is exactly due to the fact that there exist more vectors in Hilbert space than tensor products (~ tuples) of unit vectors.
An unintuitive but important fact is that n qubits do not correspond to n unit vectors in two-dimensional Hilbert space (but rather to one unit vector in 2^n-dimensional Hilbert space).
You are right about both points! PS: The second you quoted out of order. If you reread, you will see that I was referring to FOO as the first "argument" (a typo for "element"..).
You are actually in violent agreement with the parent. The grandparent poster was confused why the syntax (foo (1 2)) can be used to apply FOO to (1 2). As the parent points out, for typical Lisps this would actually…
What delegitimizes him is that he is a notorious lier.
No, this is because in Germany "university degree" is used in a more narrow sense (it is a higher standard than, say, US college degrees).
Rmarkdown has the better version control story.
Parent is correct — entanglement is exactly due to the fact that there exist more vectors in Hilbert space than tensor products (~ tuples) of unit vectors.
An unintuitive but important fact is that n qubits do not correspond to n unit vectors in two-dimensional Hilbert space (but rather to one unit vector in 2^n-dimensional Hilbert space).
You are right about both points! PS: The second you quoted out of order. If you reread, you will see that I was referring to FOO as the first "argument" (a typo for "element"..).
You are actually in violent agreement with the parent. The grandparent poster was confused why the syntax (foo (1 2)) can be used to apply FOO to (1 2). As the parent points out, for typical Lisps this would actually…
What delegitimizes him is that he is a notorious lier.
No, this is because in Germany "university degree" is used in a more narrow sense (it is a higher standard than, say, US college degrees).