The article is, but the discussion isn’t, as any pragmatic discussion about privacy concerns the biggest players within that domain.
It’s not about Google. It’s to demonstrate that in certain situations you wouldn’t say that so confidently, and that your assumptions are based on something very fragile, something that large-scale needle-nudging could…
Would you say the same if you lived in China?
The article is, but the discussion isn’t, as any pragmatic discussion about privacy concerns the biggest players within that domain.
It’s not about Google. It’s to demonstrate that in certain situations you wouldn’t say that so confidently, and that your assumptions are based on something very fragile, something that large-scale needle-nudging could…
Would you say the same if you lived in China?