So did he doxx her or didn't he? Maybe he did something else, and that is bad, but let's not move goalposts. > he retweeted someone who doxxed her email address "Doxxing" for revealing email address a bit exaggeration.…
Can you quote from the article please? Because I don't see it. The closest I get is this: > she accuses Musk of having 'always' doxxed people in an attempt to silence critics of his treatment of employees
Perhaps because not a lot of people posted links to their new profiles on Facebook and Facebook did not consider that a threat. But Facebook bans links to Telegram in WhatsApp. Also Facebook ranks posts with links to…
> I know of exactly zero other social media platforms that ban the mere mention of other social media platforms WhatsApp banned links to Telegram. Facebook ranks links to Twitter/YouTube lower than content without such…
chadloder seems like a decent person. I'd like to know what Elon or Twitter has on him. Musk promised that everyone will get explanation why they were banned. I'm waiting for it. > It's clearly political. It may be…
> he doxxed her Can you give a link to the source please? > what would make you change your mind about EM I change my mind constantly when I get more information. But my opinion of Musk is not polar either absolute evil…
I think it was this: she tagged Elon (and emailed him), so he went looking at her account. Found some older posts and reported them (maybe his assistant did that). And the account was banned until the links are removed…
I'm not sure that is true. And she is unsuspended already. Here's her explanation why https://twitter.com/TaylorLorenz/status/1604559889585410048 Here's Musk explanation:…
> You can post on FB about Twitter or Mastodon Because people do not threaten FB to leave to Mastodon. But you can't link (maybe you can now, but some time ago you couldn't) to Telegram inside Whatsapp, because Facebook…
Can you name the journalists please and some proofs of your accusations? If true, this is serious, but I cannot take it at face value.
The article is propaganda junk. Did not read every accusation from it, but it mention for example, Andy Ngo and VPS_Report. Here is the tweet about both of them: https://twitter.com/MrAndyNgo/status/1594550575383072770…
> were definitely not banned for their opinions on Musk? They banned because they shared his jet location. > he was claiming that the journalists caused him to be stalked Did he claim that specifically? I'm not sure.…
This is not exactly free speech issue, because Twitter does not ban based on political preferences/opinions. This is dishonest competition (all other major companies do the same but not as blunt: Facebook, Google,…
You use very uncommon (or I'd say, left-leaning) definition of "extremism". Basically, expressing opinion you disagree with, is extremism.
No, I'm referring to the other guys. People change mind even if facts do not change.
> use Twitter to promote right-wing extremists I did not see evidence of that.
There's non-zero number of people who are not able to enter these three queries in google, and may have desire to act on that information.
> Posting public information publicly isn't doxxing Sometimes it is. For example, name plate on the mailbox is publicly available, but posting the address with full name online constitutes doxxing. > a free speech…
Why? If one wants to harass Musk, meeting him at the airport is convenient.
Doxxing is a common attack on people who are guilty of wrongspeak. I have no strong opinion about how doxxing relates to free speech, but desire to hide your private life is understandable, and I don't see any benefit…
It is more nuanced than that. Professional criminals won’t have trouble locating Musk, but nut job activists may be not that smart and providing them location actually increases risk for Musk.
Tim Pool is swatted regularly for example. Tucker Carlson had to move after his home was attacked. There was an attack on Brett Kavanaugh. There’s a lot of such stories.
You don’t have to attack a jet in the airport. You can attack a car on the only road from the airport for example if you know exactly when and where to attack. (Also, not all the airports have good security, smaller…
Sony could be smart, for example keep existing price as is, but also offering “premium” version for higher price but with delivery this week. This would kill scalpers.
So did he doxx her or didn't he? Maybe he did something else, and that is bad, but let's not move goalposts. > he retweeted someone who doxxed her email address "Doxxing" for revealing email address a bit exaggeration.…
Can you quote from the article please? Because I don't see it. The closest I get is this: > she accuses Musk of having 'always' doxxed people in an attempt to silence critics of his treatment of employees
Perhaps because not a lot of people posted links to their new profiles on Facebook and Facebook did not consider that a threat. But Facebook bans links to Telegram in WhatsApp. Also Facebook ranks posts with links to…
> I know of exactly zero other social media platforms that ban the mere mention of other social media platforms WhatsApp banned links to Telegram. Facebook ranks links to Twitter/YouTube lower than content without such…
chadloder seems like a decent person. I'd like to know what Elon or Twitter has on him. Musk promised that everyone will get explanation why they were banned. I'm waiting for it. > It's clearly political. It may be…
> he doxxed her Can you give a link to the source please? > what would make you change your mind about EM I change my mind constantly when I get more information. But my opinion of Musk is not polar either absolute evil…
I think it was this: she tagged Elon (and emailed him), so he went looking at her account. Found some older posts and reported them (maybe his assistant did that). And the account was banned until the links are removed…
I'm not sure that is true. And she is unsuspended already. Here's her explanation why https://twitter.com/TaylorLorenz/status/1604559889585410048 Here's Musk explanation:…
> You can post on FB about Twitter or Mastodon Because people do not threaten FB to leave to Mastodon. But you can't link (maybe you can now, but some time ago you couldn't) to Telegram inside Whatsapp, because Facebook…
Can you name the journalists please and some proofs of your accusations? If true, this is serious, but I cannot take it at face value.
The article is propaganda junk. Did not read every accusation from it, but it mention for example, Andy Ngo and VPS_Report. Here is the tweet about both of them: https://twitter.com/MrAndyNgo/status/1594550575383072770…
> were definitely not banned for their opinions on Musk? They banned because they shared his jet location. > he was claiming that the journalists caused him to be stalked Did he claim that specifically? I'm not sure.…
This is not exactly free speech issue, because Twitter does not ban based on political preferences/opinions. This is dishonest competition (all other major companies do the same but not as blunt: Facebook, Google,…
You use very uncommon (or I'd say, left-leaning) definition of "extremism". Basically, expressing opinion you disagree with, is extremism.
No, I'm referring to the other guys. People change mind even if facts do not change.
> use Twitter to promote right-wing extremists I did not see evidence of that.
There's non-zero number of people who are not able to enter these three queries in google, and may have desire to act on that information.
> Posting public information publicly isn't doxxing Sometimes it is. For example, name plate on the mailbox is publicly available, but posting the address with full name online constitutes doxxing. > a free speech…
Why? If one wants to harass Musk, meeting him at the airport is convenient.
Doxxing is a common attack on people who are guilty of wrongspeak. I have no strong opinion about how doxxing relates to free speech, but desire to hide your private life is understandable, and I don't see any benefit…
It is more nuanced than that. Professional criminals won’t have trouble locating Musk, but nut job activists may be not that smart and providing them location actually increases risk for Musk.
Tim Pool is swatted regularly for example. Tucker Carlson had to move after his home was attacked. There was an attack on Brett Kavanaugh. There’s a lot of such stories.
You don’t have to attack a jet in the airport. You can attack a car on the only road from the airport for example if you know exactly when and where to attack. (Also, not all the airports have good security, smaller…
Sony could be smart, for example keep existing price as is, but also offering “premium” version for higher price but with delivery this week. This would kill scalpers.