I would say there is a chance that there are fewer vulnerabilities in the 60k~ lines of code contained within dillo than the in the however many million lines of code it takes to do anything with firefox or chromium.…
gnu awk recently got CSV support built into it which is quite nice imo though certainly less featureful than qsv appears to be
I would say there is a chance that there are fewer vulnerabilities in the 60k~ lines of code contained within dillo than the in the however many million lines of code it takes to do anything with firefox or chromium.…
gnu awk recently got CSV support built into it which is quite nice imo though certainly less featureful than qsv appears to be