I don’t mean to say you are wrong, I just mean to ask what criteria you would consider necessary to satisfy in order for you to consider a system to be reasoning.
I tend to agree but to adjudicate that someone has to define what they consider reasoning to be.
I’m curious what this means? I think the evidence is pretty convincing that, while brittle, there is reasoning going on (though it depends on your definition of reasoning which I’m curious what that is for you).
Why not? I think there’s fairly strong evidence that there is something that convincingly looks like reasoning. I think anthropic has done some nice circuit tracing and mechanistic interpretability work on this for…
One of the highest quality, nuanced strategy docs for this company I’ve ever seen. Cannot poke any holes in this. Also while people very fairly pile onto the Reality Labs disaster, it gave Meta the ray bans which is a…
[dead]
I don’t mean to say you are wrong, I just mean to ask what criteria you would consider necessary to satisfy in order for you to consider a system to be reasoning.
I tend to agree but to adjudicate that someone has to define what they consider reasoning to be.
I’m curious what this means? I think the evidence is pretty convincing that, while brittle, there is reasoning going on (though it depends on your definition of reasoning which I’m curious what that is for you).
Why not? I think there’s fairly strong evidence that there is something that convincingly looks like reasoning. I think anthropic has done some nice circuit tracing and mechanistic interpretability work on this for…
One of the highest quality, nuanced strategy docs for this company I’ve ever seen. Cannot poke any holes in this. Also while people very fairly pile onto the Reality Labs disaster, it gave Meta the ray bans which is a…
[dead]
[dead]
[dead]
[dead]