> Its not a false premise, there has been many anthropological studies that form the basis for catastrophism, extinction and a changing earth, they have been backed up with evidence for hundreds of years. Did these past…
It’s more than slightly overstated. It’s a total lie. Showing up at someone’s house and killing someone because they have your phone is always illegal in every US state. I don’t know why people are trying to defend…
I don’t think so. Can you quote something that Sangeeth wrote that indicates how they disagree with me?
How is that relevant to Sangeeth69’s comment? There doesn’t seem to be any connection between what they said and what I said.
Can you explain how this has any relevance at all to going to someone else’s house and killing them because you wrongly think your cellphone is somewhere nearby? As far as I can see the person who I was replying to is…
I think you’re spreading misinformation. I hope it’s not intentional. There is not a single state in the US where it is legal to shoot someone just for being on your property.
In what state is it legal to kill people for stealing your stuff?
I’m curious why you imagine anyone is expecting that?
There are technologists other than Apple who could help them understand.
Expecting journalists to have an answer before writing a piece is very reasonable.
Apple always has two choices. Adapt or die. They always respond in the same way. They adapt to provide integrated end user benefits from emerging technologies, and expose those technologies to developers on their…
Why not?
Sure, but if you buy something and it’s not delivered and there is no customer service department, it’s probably the best recourse.
Why not just cancel the payment?
> The contention is if history has gone through multiple and innumerable cycles and has ended up at the same outcome multiple times before. The first problem is that this is simply a false premise. Very few people would…
Clinging to dogma isn't a strategy either. If we're trading catchphrases, here's one I prefer: "In times of change learners inherit the earth while the learned find themselves beautifully equipped to deal with a world…
[flagged]
> There's a lot of written history showing this. All of which comes from an era without the public internet, the smartphone, or AI.
This doesn’t seem practical. Anyone with a bike could side-swipe a car to get a payout. And consider the less malicious case of an out of control cyclist leading to cars swerving into pedestrians to avoid hitting the…
Not really, unless you think the foreign minister is the one in power.
You first. This whole ‘metrics’ question is a distraction. If you can explain why your argument doesn’t apply to Finland, I’ll point you to a news report showing China’s support for Russia.
It’s not my job to inform you. If you don’t think China is supporting Russia’s position then you need to do some reading. Also, I guess you can’t explain why Finland isn’t Russia’s best friend despite bordering Russia.
I guess you haven’t been watching the news.
Honestly, that’s not an explanation. If one of your neighbors was beating up and stealing from another of your neighbors, are your really saying you’d cosy up to them? By this logic you’d expect Finland to be Russia’s…
> Its not a false premise, there has been many anthropological studies that form the basis for catastrophism, extinction and a changing earth, they have been backed up with evidence for hundreds of years. Did these past…
It’s more than slightly overstated. It’s a total lie. Showing up at someone’s house and killing someone because they have your phone is always illegal in every US state. I don’t know why people are trying to defend…
I don’t think so. Can you quote something that Sangeeth wrote that indicates how they disagree with me?
How is that relevant to Sangeeth69’s comment? There doesn’t seem to be any connection between what they said and what I said.
Can you explain how this has any relevance at all to going to someone else’s house and killing them because you wrongly think your cellphone is somewhere nearby? As far as I can see the person who I was replying to is…
I think you’re spreading misinformation. I hope it’s not intentional. There is not a single state in the US where it is legal to shoot someone just for being on your property.
In what state is it legal to kill people for stealing your stuff?
I’m curious why you imagine anyone is expecting that?
There are technologists other than Apple who could help them understand.
Expecting journalists to have an answer before writing a piece is very reasonable.
Apple always has two choices. Adapt or die. They always respond in the same way. They adapt to provide integrated end user benefits from emerging technologies, and expose those technologies to developers on their…
Why not?
Sure, but if you buy something and it’s not delivered and there is no customer service department, it’s probably the best recourse.
Why not just cancel the payment?
> The contention is if history has gone through multiple and innumerable cycles and has ended up at the same outcome multiple times before. The first problem is that this is simply a false premise. Very few people would…
Clinging to dogma isn't a strategy either. If we're trading catchphrases, here's one I prefer: "In times of change learners inherit the earth while the learned find themselves beautifully equipped to deal with a world…
[flagged]
[flagged]
> There's a lot of written history showing this. All of which comes from an era without the public internet, the smartphone, or AI.
This doesn’t seem practical. Anyone with a bike could side-swipe a car to get a payout. And consider the less malicious case of an out of control cyclist leading to cars swerving into pedestrians to avoid hitting the…
Not really, unless you think the foreign minister is the one in power.
You first. This whole ‘metrics’ question is a distraction. If you can explain why your argument doesn’t apply to Finland, I’ll point you to a news report showing China’s support for Russia.
It’s not my job to inform you. If you don’t think China is supporting Russia’s position then you need to do some reading. Also, I guess you can’t explain why Finland isn’t Russia’s best friend despite bordering Russia.
I guess you haven’t been watching the news.
Honestly, that’s not an explanation. If one of your neighbors was beating up and stealing from another of your neighbors, are your really saying you’d cosy up to them? By this logic you’d expect Finland to be Russia’s…