Interesting. It is using iframes behind the scenes. According to W3C it should limit the recursion depth to one, but it seems that you can get around that. Relevant:…
That's what I was thinking. It is April 1st in certain parts of the world.
I like this poster: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=OmJ-4B-mS-Y&feature=youtu.be
> The runtime and the tooling go together. The reason why tooling doesn't exist for HTML5, SVG, and Javascript is it's just so damn complex and fiddly that it's impossible to paper-over and abstract with a robust…
Tom Scott made a mistake with a similar outcome as this article, but with an SQL query that is much more subtle than DROP. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X6NJkWbM1xk By all means, find ways to fool-proof the…
Then why not use word "plus" instead? "Proving that 1 plus 1 = 2 in Rust" is a more suitable title that does not use symbol +.
Interesting. It is using iframes behind the scenes. According to W3C it should limit the recursion depth to one, but it seems that you can get around that. Relevant:…
That's what I was thinking. It is April 1st in certain parts of the world.
I like this poster: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=OmJ-4B-mS-Y&feature=youtu.be
> The runtime and the tooling go together. The reason why tooling doesn't exist for HTML5, SVG, and Javascript is it's just so damn complex and fiddly that it's impossible to paper-over and abstract with a robust…
Tom Scott made a mistake with a similar outcome as this article, but with an SQL query that is much more subtle than DROP. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X6NJkWbM1xk By all means, find ways to fool-proof the…
Then why not use word "plus" instead? "Proving that 1 plus 1 = 2 in Rust" is a more suitable title that does not use symbol +.