They wouldn't have access to that fiber, they would have to do their own fiber drop and I point out why that's bad in the remainder of my previous post. Regarding ATT/Texas: Having a competitor is not what economists…
Presumably those competitors won't have access to fiber to the home. Besides the fact that it doesn't make sense to roll out separate fiber for each provider it is clear that municipal owned fiber would decrease…
The problem is that when a company owns the last mile it has a natural monopoly. An incumbent being overthrown isn't the same as having long lasting competition.
The point is that the lines will no longer be owned by the city.
How could it? Google would own the infrastructure in the city making competition extremely difficult. New monopolist, same as the old monopolist.
It is a really bad deal because it eliminates municipal ownership of the infrastructure that would facilitate competition. Instead they are installing a new monopolist which will only seem to improve things in the short…
Don't forget the data caps.
Take him seriously about what? That he has built the devices he claims to have built? That he actually wants widespread wearable computing?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francization#Francization_in_Qu... Any large company should have a policy document which states the absurd rules including installation of French software versions and use of French…
They wouldn't have access to that fiber, they would have to do their own fiber drop and I point out why that's bad in the remainder of my previous post. Regarding ATT/Texas: Having a competitor is not what economists…
They wouldn't have access to that fiber, they would have to do their own fiber drop and I point out why that's bad in the remainder of my previous post. Regarding ATT/Texas: Having a competitor is not what economists…
Presumably those competitors won't have access to fiber to the home. Besides the fact that it doesn't make sense to roll out separate fiber for each provider it is clear that municipal owned fiber would decrease…
The problem is that when a company owns the last mile it has a natural monopoly. An incumbent being overthrown isn't the same as having long lasting competition.
The point is that the lines will no longer be owned by the city.
How could it? Google would own the infrastructure in the city making competition extremely difficult. New monopolist, same as the old monopolist.
It is a really bad deal because it eliminates municipal ownership of the infrastructure that would facilitate competition. Instead they are installing a new monopolist which will only seem to improve things in the short…
Don't forget the data caps.
Take him seriously about what? That he has built the devices he claims to have built? That he actually wants widespread wearable computing?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francization#Francization_in_Qu... Any large company should have a policy document which states the absurd rules including installation of French software versions and use of French…