I am not surprised - I am, however, surprised how little people pay attention to the risks involved with the practice.
I love how the pro nuclear crowd deals in misinformation to denigrate anyone that dares not agree with them. They asked for my standard - despite it being a tactic to try and throw the thread, they got their reply and…
[dead]
He literally mentioned tonnes of waste being generated. But don't let that get in the way of a good pile on.
> We also know how to get rid of it entirely, leaving only material that will decay to safe levels within hundreds of years In the interests of fairness, is like a citation showing that
My understanding is that this material remains toxic to life for thousands, to tens of thousands of years. Safe means that it's stored such that there's no harm to the environment for that lifetime. In all "bury it"…
I said from the start that the argument you presented was fallacious, and all you did was present it, now, because you have no other argument, you're working on aggressive attacks. You're on your own now. Bye.
It's not. The time frame we are talking about invalidates the "safety" because the earth's crust moves and warps, which allows water to access that sort of storage
You're repeating the problem - You're saying that there is less waste to deal with which magically means it's safe. You do understand that don't you?
I've never understood how people think "less" solves the issue, it's not negligible and asking to increase the number of plants surely increases the waste. Reprocessing, isn't infinite. There's going to be waste to deal…
> Nuclear waste would be the other large remaining issue, but again - society chose to create that problem and not solve it. It's not technical in nature. Care to explain, I've never seen a genuine solution that goes…
I'm going to cause an expensive outage that will ruin the company, and our careers unless you say no to sugar in the coffee!!!!
Can they? Yes, anyone can. Will they... that's a different question
Is it *vital* No. It's really helpful, but it's not vital. WRT Ukraine - the drones are now (AIUI) flown with a tethered fibre connection (inside the Ukraine) - because jammers have made radio traffic with drones near…
Yes - what does civilisations forgetting how to make the best known concrete on the planet have to do with forgetting how to make a GEIGER counter You cannot even spell the damned name properly.
You complain that nothing makes sense to yu, when given an actual example of the problem of a nuclear plant in a warzone you ask what the point is - we're done here, take your trolling elsewhere.
By your logic there are no wars.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zaporizhzhia_Nuclear_Power_Pla...
"Advanced civilization" Every civilisation for the last million years has categorised itself thus, and, yet, here we are without their technology. We still don't know how the Romans made a concrete that is as durable as…
It doesn't need to - all that needs to happen is for water to suddenly have a course to where the materials are being stored.
I do see you instantly reaching for threats of accusations, which i do view as abuse Bye.
Would have made a nice steamed ham
So, just to be clear, you're demanding that I re-answer every concern that I've already addressed otherwise you're going to label me a troll Sounds like abuse to me.
We don't have a lot of technology that we knew existed in earlier civilisations - the Aztecs, Mayans, pueblo peoples, the Easter islanders, to name just a few were doing things we have no idea how to do
Yeah, i know about that one and it kind of proves my point, it's been active as a nuclear reactor for roughly a billion years if i recall correctly - every time water seeped into the rock it slowed the neutrons down and…
I am not surprised - I am, however, surprised how little people pay attention to the risks involved with the practice.
I love how the pro nuclear crowd deals in misinformation to denigrate anyone that dares not agree with them. They asked for my standard - despite it being a tactic to try and throw the thread, they got their reply and…
[dead]
He literally mentioned tonnes of waste being generated. But don't let that get in the way of a good pile on.
> We also know how to get rid of it entirely, leaving only material that will decay to safe levels within hundreds of years In the interests of fairness, is like a citation showing that
My understanding is that this material remains toxic to life for thousands, to tens of thousands of years. Safe means that it's stored such that there's no harm to the environment for that lifetime. In all "bury it"…
I said from the start that the argument you presented was fallacious, and all you did was present it, now, because you have no other argument, you're working on aggressive attacks. You're on your own now. Bye.
It's not. The time frame we are talking about invalidates the "safety" because the earth's crust moves and warps, which allows water to access that sort of storage
You're repeating the problem - You're saying that there is less waste to deal with which magically means it's safe. You do understand that don't you?
I've never understood how people think "less" solves the issue, it's not negligible and asking to increase the number of plants surely increases the waste. Reprocessing, isn't infinite. There's going to be waste to deal…
> Nuclear waste would be the other large remaining issue, but again - society chose to create that problem and not solve it. It's not technical in nature. Care to explain, I've never seen a genuine solution that goes…
I'm going to cause an expensive outage that will ruin the company, and our careers unless you say no to sugar in the coffee!!!!
Can they? Yes, anyone can. Will they... that's a different question
Is it *vital* No. It's really helpful, but it's not vital. WRT Ukraine - the drones are now (AIUI) flown with a tethered fibre connection (inside the Ukraine) - because jammers have made radio traffic with drones near…
Yes - what does civilisations forgetting how to make the best known concrete on the planet have to do with forgetting how to make a GEIGER counter You cannot even spell the damned name properly.
You complain that nothing makes sense to yu, when given an actual example of the problem of a nuclear plant in a warzone you ask what the point is - we're done here, take your trolling elsewhere.
By your logic there are no wars.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zaporizhzhia_Nuclear_Power_Pla...
"Advanced civilization" Every civilisation for the last million years has categorised itself thus, and, yet, here we are without their technology. We still don't know how the Romans made a concrete that is as durable as…
It doesn't need to - all that needs to happen is for water to suddenly have a course to where the materials are being stored.
I do see you instantly reaching for threats of accusations, which i do view as abuse Bye.
Would have made a nice steamed ham
So, just to be clear, you're demanding that I re-answer every concern that I've already addressed otherwise you're going to label me a troll Sounds like abuse to me.
We don't have a lot of technology that we knew existed in earlier civilisations - the Aztecs, Mayans, pueblo peoples, the Easter islanders, to name just a few were doing things we have no idea how to do
Yeah, i know about that one and it kind of proves my point, it's been active as a nuclear reactor for roughly a billion years if i recall correctly - every time water seeped into the rock it slowed the neutrons down and…