middle man increases uncertainty, which is your friend
someone failed thinking 101
I have an acquaintance whose main method of argument is shouting out names of logical fallacies without pointing out to the person he's arguing with where and how it applies. This list is helpful as a guide to spot…
https://evans.uw.edu/sites/default/files/NBER%20Working%20Pa...
minimum wage earners lost $125 a month due to cut hours.
Because...
That QM is random to us is no more correct on its face than a dice roll being random. A dice roll follows rules of classical physics and given enough information about the state of the system we can accurately predict…
Did he just assume their gender? Did I just assume his gender?
I ain't try any trick yo
And it's mediocre because?
And this single line you plucked out of Atlas Shrugged is mediocre because?
Give one example of a "mediocre idea."
bump
Yes, the characters are intended to be one dimensional. You'll notice all the characters have differences from each other in important ways, because they are meant to show how certain beliefs (and contradictions in…
I love articles like these because it's nothing but regurgitated BS by people who don't get Rand, about people who aren't really 'devotees'. Writing caricatures of people and ideas and how those caricatures of people…
Bahahaha. That's funny. ESPN's entire business model is based on being just popular enough that any cable company not carrying it would go under so they can demand something on the order of $6.50 per subscriber when the…
You should always trade by specifying your own limit.
It's not even controversial to anyone who knows math. It's a consequence of the intermediate value theorem.
What if Bigfoot is dressed in a burka? Under your assumptions your system is logically sound and under the system you can conclude, but in broader context you assume that which you would like to prove. You started with…
Other people don't factor into this. Proving to them is not necessary. Once an event occurs, it occurred. Your knowledge of what that event or the total state of that event might be uncertain, but the event's occurrence…
Not true. Given a hypothesis "there exists" the first observed instance is proof of the positive. The inverse however, again, requires you to sample the entire population and collect all data.
It's just missing the better alternative. It's much more correct and useful to say "given all evidence the probability there are yeti is almost zero" correctly doesn't rule it impossible and correctly asserts that we…
This is an unnecessary. "You can't prove a negative" isn't a statement about logic, it's a statement statistical evidence (incorporating logic). You need to observe the entire population in order to reduce a probability…
This article demonstrates the danger of thinking statistics is logic - you can only use statistics with the analytical framework firmly set up...not as a replacement. The United States is just that - United. States. 38…
One of the co-authors has been writing about this extensively. http://wmbriggs.com/post/15337/
middle man increases uncertainty, which is your friend
someone failed thinking 101
I have an acquaintance whose main method of argument is shouting out names of logical fallacies without pointing out to the person he's arguing with where and how it applies. This list is helpful as a guide to spot…
https://evans.uw.edu/sites/default/files/NBER%20Working%20Pa...
minimum wage earners lost $125 a month due to cut hours.
Because...
That QM is random to us is no more correct on its face than a dice roll being random. A dice roll follows rules of classical physics and given enough information about the state of the system we can accurately predict…
Did he just assume their gender? Did I just assume his gender?
I ain't try any trick yo
And it's mediocre because?
And this single line you plucked out of Atlas Shrugged is mediocre because?
Give one example of a "mediocre idea."
bump
Yes, the characters are intended to be one dimensional. You'll notice all the characters have differences from each other in important ways, because they are meant to show how certain beliefs (and contradictions in…
I love articles like these because it's nothing but regurgitated BS by people who don't get Rand, about people who aren't really 'devotees'. Writing caricatures of people and ideas and how those caricatures of people…
Bahahaha. That's funny. ESPN's entire business model is based on being just popular enough that any cable company not carrying it would go under so they can demand something on the order of $6.50 per subscriber when the…
You should always trade by specifying your own limit.
It's not even controversial to anyone who knows math. It's a consequence of the intermediate value theorem.
What if Bigfoot is dressed in a burka? Under your assumptions your system is logically sound and under the system you can conclude, but in broader context you assume that which you would like to prove. You started with…
Other people don't factor into this. Proving to them is not necessary. Once an event occurs, it occurred. Your knowledge of what that event or the total state of that event might be uncertain, but the event's occurrence…
Not true. Given a hypothesis "there exists" the first observed instance is proof of the positive. The inverse however, again, requires you to sample the entire population and collect all data.
It's just missing the better alternative. It's much more correct and useful to say "given all evidence the probability there are yeti is almost zero" correctly doesn't rule it impossible and correctly asserts that we…
This is an unnecessary. "You can't prove a negative" isn't a statement about logic, it's a statement statistical evidence (incorporating logic). You need to observe the entire population in order to reduce a probability…
This article demonstrates the danger of thinking statistics is logic - you can only use statistics with the analytical framework firmly set up...not as a replacement. The United States is just that - United. States. 38…
One of the co-authors has been writing about this extensively. http://wmbriggs.com/post/15337/