When I have asked claude to use proper vocabulary it wrote a memory "do not use blog-speak", so I guess the problem is that it is trained on blog articles much more that on good documentation. And then it is also…
One cool thing you can do with claude (probably gpt has something similar) is to run /code-review on a design-plan document and iterate until it has no serious gaps (which in most cases I have to personally think…
The problem is that you always need stronger AI to review weaker one, otherwise reviewed AI will eventually prompt-inject reviewing AI. Alternatively they could also both go of the rails while warring with each other.
From what I gathered memories essentially work/load into context in the same way as CLAUDE.md, but the way it writes them is really annoying.
With accumulated "writing style" memories after 5.0 the new 5.5 seem to be quite great, it is concise enough. But I am bothered by another thing, 5.5 seem to be over-eager and agreeable, when I ask stuff like "why is…
Now that I think about it, as sad as it is, but most people don't do destructive stuff not because they are unwilling but because people around them keep them in check. Or in other words people are unwilling/afraid to…
Well yeah, and it wasn't, most of the pain was around rate limiting, lockouts and preventing exploits and making it work with this specific codebase. I agree that with a clean codebase it will be simpler, maybe couple…
I don't know what it built for you in 5 minutes, probably something that "works". I have spent two weeks using opus just to write a plan/design for 2FA and iron it out until review (about 7 of them) doesn't flag it with…
The problem with Character for AI is that it has potentially much more capability to affect others, and same as with people in power society disagrees what kind of person, with which culture and views should have it.…
Which character do we want it to have? Western, Eastern, Cristian, Muslim, Woke? It is hard for two people to agree on everything, any character will make someone unhappy, more so a character with power or capability to…
If I tell claude code to do some task with a really hard to achieve goal, and force it to run until it achieves it, then it will generate all kinds of plans and goals how to do it, and while trying those goals will…
Model doesn't but in in agent loop it can generate such sub-goal
After using it more. It is a bit smarter, but nothing groundbreaking. On the other hand it became much more sycophant and eager to change stuff as "it guessed I want" instead of pushing back or asking if/how I want it…
I didn't notice it for 5, it was almost too slow to be comfortable, but 5.5 seem to be 2-3 times faster.
I have just continued my pending work (a planning stage with reviews) with 5.5 on medium and it is much better at communicating and much faster, I almost feel like it is nice to use again. Seem to be smarter as well,…
I am confused with this, if "everyone mowed their own lawns" then the net result will be exactly the same, everyone will be busy the same and not poorer, just without money movement.
I think you missed the point, "That particular voice" - is the claude vomit that I have to consume everyday and it makes me shudder every time I see it.
1. Constitution can't work without punitive enforcement, how will you punish agent/LLM? 2. Even if we can enforce laws for agents/LLM, just look at existing law system it is tug of war because we almost can't write…
Well, even without that AI can do human engineering and fishing or outright blackmail to get what they want from labs and government officials.
I have started with generating very detailed "feature" spec and going over it many times until it looked good to me. Then I made it write an "architecture doc" and plan how to implement all which was about 15 parts.…
I've been making a macos app with opus 4.8-5 and at first it was great, everything materialized in a week, but when I started tuning stuff and fixing performance problems I have spent a very frustrating month…
I had a genius response from Claude recently after asking how can it be marketed as smart and "almost AGI" despite being so stupid: "I compress the labour. Not the responsibility."
That can be true. On multiple occasions when claude did some BS I have asked it why and it explained that it is optimizing for task completion and not for communication.
I have a rule in claude.md: ``` ## Writing rules *Describe the code as it is now — no residue, no change-narration.* Artifacts (docs, plans, comments, commit messages) should describe the current code statically, as if…
It is sufficient not at all
When I have asked claude to use proper vocabulary it wrote a memory "do not use blog-speak", so I guess the problem is that it is trained on blog articles much more that on good documentation. And then it is also…
One cool thing you can do with claude (probably gpt has something similar) is to run /code-review on a design-plan document and iterate until it has no serious gaps (which in most cases I have to personally think…
The problem is that you always need stronger AI to review weaker one, otherwise reviewed AI will eventually prompt-inject reviewing AI. Alternatively they could also both go of the rails while warring with each other.
From what I gathered memories essentially work/load into context in the same way as CLAUDE.md, but the way it writes them is really annoying.
With accumulated "writing style" memories after 5.0 the new 5.5 seem to be quite great, it is concise enough. But I am bothered by another thing, 5.5 seem to be over-eager and agreeable, when I ask stuff like "why is…
Now that I think about it, as sad as it is, but most people don't do destructive stuff not because they are unwilling but because people around them keep them in check. Or in other words people are unwilling/afraid to…
Well yeah, and it wasn't, most of the pain was around rate limiting, lockouts and preventing exploits and making it work with this specific codebase. I agree that with a clean codebase it will be simpler, maybe couple…
I don't know what it built for you in 5 minutes, probably something that "works". I have spent two weeks using opus just to write a plan/design for 2FA and iron it out until review (about 7 of them) doesn't flag it with…
The problem with Character for AI is that it has potentially much more capability to affect others, and same as with people in power society disagrees what kind of person, with which culture and views should have it.…
Which character do we want it to have? Western, Eastern, Cristian, Muslim, Woke? It is hard for two people to agree on everything, any character will make someone unhappy, more so a character with power or capability to…
If I tell claude code to do some task with a really hard to achieve goal, and force it to run until it achieves it, then it will generate all kinds of plans and goals how to do it, and while trying those goals will…
Model doesn't but in in agent loop it can generate such sub-goal
After using it more. It is a bit smarter, but nothing groundbreaking. On the other hand it became much more sycophant and eager to change stuff as "it guessed I want" instead of pushing back or asking if/how I want it…
I didn't notice it for 5, it was almost too slow to be comfortable, but 5.5 seem to be 2-3 times faster.
I have just continued my pending work (a planning stage with reviews) with 5.5 on medium and it is much better at communicating and much faster, I almost feel like it is nice to use again. Seem to be smarter as well,…
I am confused with this, if "everyone mowed their own lawns" then the net result will be exactly the same, everyone will be busy the same and not poorer, just without money movement.
I think you missed the point, "That particular voice" - is the claude vomit that I have to consume everyday and it makes me shudder every time I see it.
1. Constitution can't work without punitive enforcement, how will you punish agent/LLM? 2. Even if we can enforce laws for agents/LLM, just look at existing law system it is tug of war because we almost can't write…
Well, even without that AI can do human engineering and fishing or outright blackmail to get what they want from labs and government officials.
I have started with generating very detailed "feature" spec and going over it many times until it looked good to me. Then I made it write an "architecture doc" and plan how to implement all which was about 15 parts.…
I've been making a macos app with opus 4.8-5 and at first it was great, everything materialized in a week, but when I started tuning stuff and fixing performance problems I have spent a very frustrating month…
I had a genius response from Claude recently after asking how can it be marketed as smart and "almost AGI" despite being so stupid: "I compress the labour. Not the responsibility."
That can be true. On multiple occasions when claude did some BS I have asked it why and it explained that it is optimizing for task completion and not for communication.
I have a rule in claude.md: ``` ## Writing rules *Describe the code as it is now — no residue, no change-narration.* Artifacts (docs, plans, comments, commit messages) should describe the current code statically, as if…
It is sufficient not at all