Because it’s no longer a problem if you use frontier models.
> You raise everyone up simultaneously by distributing in a rational measured way. No, see, that doesn't make sense. If you "distribute in a rational measured way" you have central planning. And central planning indeed…
Exactly, thanks!
Man, I really hope that eventually this technology will allow us to build beautiful housing again.
It’s not though because even though inequality is increasing, everyone is getting richer including bottom decile.
> Look at the margins for competitive generic drugs and over the counter medicine. Margins are tight. Yes, and reducing manufacturing cost if you have tight margin has huge potential for profit.
> You don't get it. [...] A society is not "richer" because the amount of financially backed power is one concentrated set of hands. No, you don't get it. Read again my post - I've explicately said that EVERY decile is…
Would you rather have richer (in real terms) society (including richer lowest decile) with larger wealth inequality or poorer society with smaller inequalities? You might argue that these are not really the only two…
Extremely expensive and time consuming clinical trials. If we’d increase success rate by even few % by selecting better candidates it would be huge.
How exactly is there no potential for large profit there? I’d say there potential for huge profit if you reduce cost of manufacturing drugs!
So getting drug candidates with high success rate actually is the hard part.
Are we against spell checkers nowadays?
That's really dumb challenge in my opinion.
Listen to Bach, if that doesn’t work then your standards are not high but completely wrong.
Not only are we not all in a race to the bottom, in European countries we've got full on gerontocracy (e.g. triple lock in UK or pensioners having larger income compared to median worker in France). You know, we could…
> the Hilbert space is real-valued and therefore (a vector of) ℵ₁. But cardinality of real numbers might not be ℵ₁. It's literally unprovable in ZFC.
Surely you must realize how absurd your line of thinking is. Far left and far right are not labels based on popularity! Communism is still far left ideology if you live in communist country, same with fascism being far…
> a Christmas card sent with a swastika and “Heil Hitler”, and an email thread signed off with “Heil und Sieg” Ahh, old good mild conservatism.
> Im going to say this again, the "pure math" academic types need to get a grip. Plenty of your peers got PHD's and happily made a fortune in finance, while screwing the world (See 2008 housing bubble) and none of you…
Yeah, as always in AI hard things are easy and easy things are hard. How many times have I heard condescending comments from programmers that radiologists are just about to be replaced by AI. And well, AI turned out to…
There's not reason to think that it has to be same this time. If AI becomes better than humans at cognitive work, what extra jobs would get created?
They are not, opus 5.5 level intelligence will be dirt cheap in a year or two (in non-subsidized api pricing).
> That is, if your entire self worth is tied to your work. No. It's also if you take pride in your work and your self worth is partially based on that. And I think there's nothing wrong with that (quite contrary - I…
Aren’t waymos actually much safer and have less incidents per mile compared with human drivers? (Yes, they are and yes they do)
No. If these tools could do your work, people would feel existential dread anyway. It doesn’t matter at all if they are coworkers or tools (I really don’t see why would it ever matter).
Because it’s no longer a problem if you use frontier models.
> You raise everyone up simultaneously by distributing in a rational measured way. No, see, that doesn't make sense. If you "distribute in a rational measured way" you have central planning. And central planning indeed…
Exactly, thanks!
Man, I really hope that eventually this technology will allow us to build beautiful housing again.
It’s not though because even though inequality is increasing, everyone is getting richer including bottom decile.
> Look at the margins for competitive generic drugs and over the counter medicine. Margins are tight. Yes, and reducing manufacturing cost if you have tight margin has huge potential for profit.
> You don't get it. [...] A society is not "richer" because the amount of financially backed power is one concentrated set of hands. No, you don't get it. Read again my post - I've explicately said that EVERY decile is…
Would you rather have richer (in real terms) society (including richer lowest decile) with larger wealth inequality or poorer society with smaller inequalities? You might argue that these are not really the only two…
Extremely expensive and time consuming clinical trials. If we’d increase success rate by even few % by selecting better candidates it would be huge.
How exactly is there no potential for large profit there? I’d say there potential for huge profit if you reduce cost of manufacturing drugs!
So getting drug candidates with high success rate actually is the hard part.
Are we against spell checkers nowadays?
That's really dumb challenge in my opinion.
Listen to Bach, if that doesn’t work then your standards are not high but completely wrong.
Not only are we not all in a race to the bottom, in European countries we've got full on gerontocracy (e.g. triple lock in UK or pensioners having larger income compared to median worker in France). You know, we could…
> the Hilbert space is real-valued and therefore (a vector of) ℵ₁. But cardinality of real numbers might not be ℵ₁. It's literally unprovable in ZFC.
Surely you must realize how absurd your line of thinking is. Far left and far right are not labels based on popularity! Communism is still far left ideology if you live in communist country, same with fascism being far…
> a Christmas card sent with a swastika and “Heil Hitler”, and an email thread signed off with “Heil und Sieg” Ahh, old good mild conservatism.
> Im going to say this again, the "pure math" academic types need to get a grip. Plenty of your peers got PHD's and happily made a fortune in finance, while screwing the world (See 2008 housing bubble) and none of you…
Yeah, as always in AI hard things are easy and easy things are hard. How many times have I heard condescending comments from programmers that radiologists are just about to be replaced by AI. And well, AI turned out to…
There's not reason to think that it has to be same this time. If AI becomes better than humans at cognitive work, what extra jobs would get created?
They are not, opus 5.5 level intelligence will be dirt cheap in a year or two (in non-subsidized api pricing).
> That is, if your entire self worth is tied to your work. No. It's also if you take pride in your work and your self worth is partially based on that. And I think there's nothing wrong with that (quite contrary - I…
Aren’t waymos actually much safer and have less incidents per mile compared with human drivers? (Yes, they are and yes they do)
No. If these tools could do your work, people would feel existential dread anyway. It doesn’t matter at all if they are coworkers or tools (I really don’t see why would it ever matter).