Composeability is front and center in GQL, so you may want to consider it.
I wouldn't say larger, just different. You can try to achieve data integration by forcing everybody to agree on an ontology. You can also just build your own graph data model and when the time for integration comes, see…
How would you think anyone should call a graph query language done by the SQL committee?
Many standards are also available via the national standards body of your locale (e.g. ANSI), often at a cheaper rate.
Just say ISO GQL
Just looking at https://db-engines.com/en/ranking/graph+dbms clearly shows Neo4j as the most prominent graph db. I think even Cosmos as number 2 might be misleading here, as Cosmos is a multi-model product and db…
AQL is a vendor-specific multi model language that lately has picked up some ideas from openCypher, like pattern matching. GQL is a project for creating an International Standard language in the process of being created…
SPARQL requires buy-in into the world of the semantic web even when all you want to do is store and query graph data. Also, property graphs wouldn't have managed to get the traction they have if SPARQL would have been…
The GQL project just started. Since it is going to be an ISO standard, the specification is only available for members while under development but may be purchased from ISO once final (Same as for SQL, though you can…
Composeability is front and center in GQL, so you may want to consider it.
I wouldn't say larger, just different. You can try to achieve data integration by forcing everybody to agree on an ontology. You can also just build your own graph data model and when the time for integration comes, see…
How would you think anyone should call a graph query language done by the SQL committee?
Many standards are also available via the national standards body of your locale (e.g. ANSI), often at a cheaper rate.
Just say ISO GQL
Just looking at https://db-engines.com/en/ranking/graph+dbms clearly shows Neo4j as the most prominent graph db. I think even Cosmos as number 2 might be misleading here, as Cosmos is a multi-model product and db…
AQL is a vendor-specific multi model language that lately has picked up some ideas from openCypher, like pattern matching. GQL is a project for creating an International Standard language in the process of being created…
SPARQL requires buy-in into the world of the semantic web even when all you want to do is store and query graph data. Also, property graphs wouldn't have managed to get the traction they have if SPARQL would have been…
The GQL project just started. Since it is going to be an ISO standard, the specification is only available for members while under development but may be purchased from ISO once final (Same as for SQL, though you can…