I assumed you need consent to receive PII, full stop. Again IANAL, but I assumed saying you don't do anything at all with the PII you receive doesn't exempt you from anything under GDPR. I may be wrong, though I hope…
IANAL but European law is nuanced over whether IP addresses are PII. If I'm not mistaken it's been ruled they are for ISPs, rationale being they have enough other data points that once correlated with IP addresses allow…
> To be clear, the key can never leave the TPM (with how tpm-fido is implemented). Yep sorry you're right you wouldn't get the actual keys to use elsewhere, you can just use them as if you had them on the "compromised"…
Isn't this approach significantly less secure than Apple's though? As far as I understand the secure enclave coprocessor in Apple devices stores key material and implements user verification (TouchID etc.), right?…
From the standpoint of a European, this would have been totally fine some 200 years ago
Don't listen to these mindless code golfers. Your experiment does indeed prove your point imho.
I'm starting to think Samsung is running a social experiment instead
Total hipocrisy
I do share your vision externalreality, I'm just saying from an approximate, but factual, point of view, unikernels won't share a fraction of containers popularity until they can compete in the two areas I mentioned. ️
It's unfortunate, but unikernels are going to be the future - VS the present - until they beat containers in the only two things that matter: ease of use and memory consumption
BS alert
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyclomatic_complexity
I assumed you need consent to receive PII, full stop. Again IANAL, but I assumed saying you don't do anything at all with the PII you receive doesn't exempt you from anything under GDPR. I may be wrong, though I hope…
IANAL but European law is nuanced over whether IP addresses are PII. If I'm not mistaken it's been ruled they are for ISPs, rationale being they have enough other data points that once correlated with IP addresses allow…
> To be clear, the key can never leave the TPM (with how tpm-fido is implemented). Yep sorry you're right you wouldn't get the actual keys to use elsewhere, you can just use them as if you had them on the "compromised"…
Isn't this approach significantly less secure than Apple's though? As far as I understand the secure enclave coprocessor in Apple devices stores key material and implements user verification (TouchID etc.), right?…
From the standpoint of a European, this would have been totally fine some 200 years ago
Don't listen to these mindless code golfers. Your experiment does indeed prove your point imho.
I'm starting to think Samsung is running a social experiment instead
Total hipocrisy
I do share your vision externalreality, I'm just saying from an approximate, but factual, point of view, unikernels won't share a fraction of containers popularity until they can compete in the two areas I mentioned. ️
It's unfortunate, but unikernels are going to be the future - VS the present - until they beat containers in the only two things that matter: ease of use and memory consumption
BS alert
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyclomatic_complexity