I think that might have been true in 2009. It's far from true today. I just noticed this FB blog post: https://developers.facebook.com/ads/blog/post/2018/05/09/rel.... The chart at the top shows app vs. web use of…
Unfortunately I can't find numbers that break down mobile site vs. native app use. Judging by how poorly maintained and how rarely updated the mobile site is, I think it's safe to assume that the vast majority of people…
"90% of Facebook’s daily active users access it via mobile" - https://thenextweb.com/facebook/2016/01/27/90-of-facebooks-d... And before you suggest that those users might still be using it on desktop more than on…
Did you uninstall that after using it? Otherwise that extension still has the ability to "read and change your data on all facebook.com sites." For all you know, it may have uploaded a copy of all your Facebook data to…
Well it's an automated system, so it's highly unlikely that someone is reading all (or any) of your messages. The volume of messages Facebook and Google process every day is astronomical, so no manual oversight process…
Google does scan for child pornography in Gmail: https://www.pcworld.com/article/2461400/how-google-handles-c.... This is done with PhotoDNA, a system used by many large tech companies for child pornography detection:…
If they didn't scan and detect child porn, there would be articles about how they're letting people get away with sharing child porn on Messenger. It seems there's no way for Facebook to win here, given that people want…
> so the original memo was more of a put up or shut up piece than an RFC. That couldn't be further from the truth. Facebook's internal communications happen almost 100% exclusively through Facebook itself, meaning this…
So now you've given that extension full access to your Facebook account. And if you didn't uninstall it after using it, it's still able to see everything you do on Facebook. How is this any different from the Cambridge…
I think that might have been true in 2009. It's far from true today. I just noticed this FB blog post: https://developers.facebook.com/ads/blog/post/2018/05/09/rel.... The chart at the top shows app vs. web use of…
Unfortunately I can't find numbers that break down mobile site vs. native app use. Judging by how poorly maintained and how rarely updated the mobile site is, I think it's safe to assume that the vast majority of people…
"90% of Facebook’s daily active users access it via mobile" - https://thenextweb.com/facebook/2016/01/27/90-of-facebooks-d... And before you suggest that those users might still be using it on desktop more than on…
Did you uninstall that after using it? Otherwise that extension still has the ability to "read and change your data on all facebook.com sites." For all you know, it may have uploaded a copy of all your Facebook data to…
Well it's an automated system, so it's highly unlikely that someone is reading all (or any) of your messages. The volume of messages Facebook and Google process every day is astronomical, so no manual oversight process…
Google does scan for child pornography in Gmail: https://www.pcworld.com/article/2461400/how-google-handles-c.... This is done with PhotoDNA, a system used by many large tech companies for child pornography detection:…
If they didn't scan and detect child porn, there would be articles about how they're letting people get away with sharing child porn on Messenger. It seems there's no way for Facebook to win here, given that people want…
> so the original memo was more of a put up or shut up piece than an RFC. That couldn't be further from the truth. Facebook's internal communications happen almost 100% exclusively through Facebook itself, meaning this…
So now you've given that extension full access to your Facebook account. And if you didn't uninstall it after using it, it's still able to see everything you do on Facebook. How is this any different from the Cambridge…