you got me
I see a lot of detailed analysis in this thread, which is impressive given that literally nobody has read anything more than the half dozen factoids that have been released. At best, some of you are looking at maps of…
that's SOP for every av program. have incident? ground the fleet. doesn't matter why, or who's at fault.
goes to show, sdv's have to be perfect in the eyes of the public. you wouldn't seriously recommend adding a test like that to a regular driving licence. also that testing does happen in the case of every av program i…
will never happen. least not with any explicit depth sensors. any car with lidar has depth perception orders of magnitude better than yours and would never chase an object merely because it resembles road markings
you got me
I see a lot of detailed analysis in this thread, which is impressive given that literally nobody has read anything more than the half dozen factoids that have been released. At best, some of you are looking at maps of…
that's SOP for every av program. have incident? ground the fleet. doesn't matter why, or who's at fault.
goes to show, sdv's have to be perfect in the eyes of the public. you wouldn't seriously recommend adding a test like that to a regular driving licence. also that testing does happen in the case of every av program i…
will never happen. least not with any explicit depth sensors. any car with lidar has depth perception orders of magnitude better than yours and would never chase an object merely because it resembles road markings