Actors routinely memorize whole plays, so it is not implausible for someone to have memorized 15 min of A Tale of Two Cities.
Is many worlds falsifiable?
Why didnt you vibecode the The nonfunctional requirements?
CSS is for styling and layout, but there is no conceptual reason this couldn’t be defined through functions. “Code” is not a concern like semantic vs style.
Most regex dialects allow whitespace and comments, so that already gets you halfway there.
Who would want to use a browser which couldnt render html?
The cool thing with a wasm-based xslt implementation is there is no need for the browser vendors to gate keep it. Just use what you like or develop your own.
The reason HTML is more widely used than latex is obviously because browsers support it natively.
It is not because of specific known vulnerabilities. It is because it is old legacy unmaintained code which is rarely used and which has a large attack surface.
> XHTML was dropped in favor of HTML5 and XSLT was pretty much useless after that Client-side XSLT was always pretty useless, but I dont see what HTML5 has to do with it? The only real use case for client-side XSLT was…
The low barrier to authoring was very important. No tools needed except notepad and a browser. Syntax easy to understand and write by hand. But I don’t think the ambiguous html parsing made it easier. If anything it…
> Well an XHTML parser (and serializer) is a lot simpler Perhaps, but a combined html and xhtml parser is more complex than just a html parser. Since html already is entrenched, xhtml would be in addition to html, not…
> what are the good reasons for dropping legacy code? Reducing attack surface.
There is nothing component-based about xhtml compared to html. It is just html with xml syntax.
Use a good (human-written) textbook and solve the exercises. Use AI to ask clarifying questions when necessary.
It really depends on context. Are you programming for your own enjoyment or education, are you performing research, or are you paid to solve problems for a business? In reasearch and academia, originality is celebrated.…
Something is fishy about this story though. The claim is the credentials used was somehow leaked and purchased on the black market. But it doesn’t matter how weak or strong the password is if it is leaked.
> VB.NET was always second class to c# VB.NET and C# was treated as equals for a long time. I believe MS initially expected VB.NET to be the mainstream .net language, while C# was a compromise to attract Java and Delphi…
Probably because someone has created the page and nobody has deleted it.
At least a much more plausible explanation than the “ancient observatory” theory.
Stonehenge is older than the pyramids though.
You dont need giant rocks to observe the sun and moon though.
The BBC does not actually claim that.
Of course the the theory is wrong: > new investigations since the 1960s have discredited Hawkins' ideas.
> the further back you go, the less historical they become This makes zero sense.
Actors routinely memorize whole plays, so it is not implausible for someone to have memorized 15 min of A Tale of Two Cities.
Is many worlds falsifiable?
Why didnt you vibecode the The nonfunctional requirements?
CSS is for styling and layout, but there is no conceptual reason this couldn’t be defined through functions. “Code” is not a concern like semantic vs style.
Most regex dialects allow whitespace and comments, so that already gets you halfway there.
Who would want to use a browser which couldnt render html?
The cool thing with a wasm-based xslt implementation is there is no need for the browser vendors to gate keep it. Just use what you like or develop your own.
The reason HTML is more widely used than latex is obviously because browsers support it natively.
It is not because of specific known vulnerabilities. It is because it is old legacy unmaintained code which is rarely used and which has a large attack surface.
> XHTML was dropped in favor of HTML5 and XSLT was pretty much useless after that Client-side XSLT was always pretty useless, but I dont see what HTML5 has to do with it? The only real use case for client-side XSLT was…
The low barrier to authoring was very important. No tools needed except notepad and a browser. Syntax easy to understand and write by hand. But I don’t think the ambiguous html parsing made it easier. If anything it…
> Well an XHTML parser (and serializer) is a lot simpler Perhaps, but a combined html and xhtml parser is more complex than just a html parser. Since html already is entrenched, xhtml would be in addition to html, not…
> what are the good reasons for dropping legacy code? Reducing attack surface.
There is nothing component-based about xhtml compared to html. It is just html with xml syntax.
Use a good (human-written) textbook and solve the exercises. Use AI to ask clarifying questions when necessary.
It really depends on context. Are you programming for your own enjoyment or education, are you performing research, or are you paid to solve problems for a business? In reasearch and academia, originality is celebrated.…
Something is fishy about this story though. The claim is the credentials used was somehow leaked and purchased on the black market. But it doesn’t matter how weak or strong the password is if it is leaked.
> VB.NET was always second class to c# VB.NET and C# was treated as equals for a long time. I believe MS initially expected VB.NET to be the mainstream .net language, while C# was a compromise to attract Java and Delphi…
Probably because someone has created the page and nobody has deleted it.
At least a much more plausible explanation than the “ancient observatory” theory.
Stonehenge is older than the pyramids though.
You dont need giant rocks to observe the sun and moon though.
The BBC does not actually claim that.
Of course the the theory is wrong: > new investigations since the 1960s have discredited Hawkins' ideas.
> the further back you go, the less historical they become This makes zero sense.