If I’m learning about a new topic, I do assume it might be bullshit and have a variety of sources to help give me confidence on truthiness. The llm really has nothing to do with this! I don’t know if I’d trust a random…
I basically agree with wolpoli and I think you as well. If the content ends up good, who cares. Right now, it takes work and human collaboration to get quality content out of an llm. In the future it probably won’t.
GenAi is a tool like any other. If an author has been able to build earn my trust, I’d trust them to use the genai tool responsibly as well. This includes being ultimately responsible for the veracity of any claims…
Who cares? This is both my initial reaction and, on reflection, something I’m genuinely curious about. If one can’t tell the difference without deep investigation, the consumer likely doesn’t care (I don’t). Hopefully /…
This sounds like a junior dev on the path to B). I think the desire to do the right thing says a lot and finding that right thing takes time.
If I’m learning about a new topic, I do assume it might be bullshit and have a variety of sources to help give me confidence on truthiness. The llm really has nothing to do with this! I don’t know if I’d trust a random…
I basically agree with wolpoli and I think you as well. If the content ends up good, who cares. Right now, it takes work and human collaboration to get quality content out of an llm. In the future it probably won’t.
GenAi is a tool like any other. If an author has been able to build earn my trust, I’d trust them to use the genai tool responsibly as well. This includes being ultimately responsible for the veracity of any claims…
Who cares? This is both my initial reaction and, on reflection, something I’m genuinely curious about. If one can’t tell the difference without deep investigation, the consumer likely doesn’t care (I don’t). Hopefully /…
This sounds like a junior dev on the path to B). I think the desire to do the right thing says a lot and finding that right thing takes time.