No, software licenses apply to distribution of of software. The developers made this publicly accessible to users interacting with it remotely through a computer network, in violation of the license. What the developers…
It was distributed under AGPL3 to users interacting with it remotely through a computer network. https://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl-3.0.en.html#section13 It's not a matter of whether or not the developers meant to…
> I don't think it was intended We can speculate as to whether the developers made a mistake or not, but it was publicly accessible, putting it in violation of the licensing terms.
It says in the article that it was publicly available
We're facing a supply shortage and you want to eliminate the laws that are keeping tiki torches in stock?!
My health insurance is tied to my employer. I have more to risk than being disliked by building the next e-commerce platform fo r Trump Steaks.
No, software licenses apply to distribution of of software. The developers made this publicly accessible to users interacting with it remotely through a computer network, in violation of the license. What the developers…
It was distributed under AGPL3 to users interacting with it remotely through a computer network. https://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl-3.0.en.html#section13 It's not a matter of whether or not the developers meant to…
> I don't think it was intended We can speculate as to whether the developers made a mistake or not, but it was publicly accessible, putting it in violation of the licensing terms.
It says in the article that it was publicly available
We're facing a supply shortage and you want to eliminate the laws that are keeping tiki torches in stock?!
My health insurance is tied to my employer. I have more to risk than being disliked by building the next e-commerce platform fo r Trump Steaks.