> This is an honest question to people who side with the proposal. At what point would these measures become unnecessary? What are the conditions? > Btw what is the name of the ideology that one would use to justify…
The parent comment shouldn't be downvoted, men definitely do receive an extra level of suspicion when it comes to children, especially younger ones.
> Through 21 years running one of the few campus support centers exclusively for men, he said, “I’ve thought it can only get better. But it just has gone nowhere. Not only are there not programs like ours that are…
Honestly, I think it's because there's this feminist idea that a woman should bear no responsibility for anything labeled bad that happens to her, especially if it involves anything sexual. Like most things, that idea…
Not really. What I was getting at was that social forces change over time. Certain members of the "man" class benefited from past social forces, not some innate powerful characteristic of the "man" class. So, it's wrong…
> As long as you ignore who in society actually has power > ....Senate...president...board members...ceos. A man or a group of men having power is not the same as men, as a class, having power.
It's kinda unfortunate that this is the top comment. Couldn't we talk about Turkey instead of quoting books that are at best marginally related to the present situation?
> than critiqued the attitude behind it. That response was more contempt than critique.
> In fact, Dr. Cheryan’s research shows that young men tend not to major in English for the same reasons women don’t pick computer science: They compare their notions of who they are to their stereotypes of English…
I'm glad she was able to figure out that the team culture didn't fit her and leave for something more suitable to her preferences. Different people are different, and a single team cannot accommodate every style.
> This is an honest question to people who side with the proposal. At what point would these measures become unnecessary? What are the conditions? > Btw what is the name of the ideology that one would use to justify…
The parent comment shouldn't be downvoted, men definitely do receive an extra level of suspicion when it comes to children, especially younger ones.
> Through 21 years running one of the few campus support centers exclusively for men, he said, “I’ve thought it can only get better. But it just has gone nowhere. Not only are there not programs like ours that are…
Honestly, I think it's because there's this feminist idea that a woman should bear no responsibility for anything labeled bad that happens to her, especially if it involves anything sexual. Like most things, that idea…
Not really. What I was getting at was that social forces change over time. Certain members of the "man" class benefited from past social forces, not some innate powerful characteristic of the "man" class. So, it's wrong…
> As long as you ignore who in society actually has power > ....Senate...president...board members...ceos. A man or a group of men having power is not the same as men, as a class, having power.
It's kinda unfortunate that this is the top comment. Couldn't we talk about Turkey instead of quoting books that are at best marginally related to the present situation?
> than critiqued the attitude behind it. That response was more contempt than critique.
> In fact, Dr. Cheryan’s research shows that young men tend not to major in English for the same reasons women don’t pick computer science: They compare their notions of who they are to their stereotypes of English…
I'm glad she was able to figure out that the team culture didn't fit her and leave for something more suitable to her preferences. Different people are different, and a single team cannot accommodate every style.