This is the approach we’ve taken with other similar systems too. Things can go so horribly wrong underneath your containers that the concept of having only one cluster in a prod scenario and maintaining it mid-air would…
According to the FAQ[1], they also offer 9.9.9.10, which passes client subnet at the cost of other features. [1] https://www.quad9.net/faq
Besides response time, the next level of comparison is how well geo-DNS-based services (global load balancing, etc.) support these resolvers. AFAIK 8.8.8.8 gives decent results in most places, though I've seen…
I too felt that Spring Boot was a response to the simplicity of Dropwizard. I worked at a place which had two opposing java camps. One was heavily into Spring Boot, the other, Dropwizard. This might not be a fair…
This is the approach we’ve taken with other similar systems too. Things can go so horribly wrong underneath your containers that the concept of having only one cluster in a prod scenario and maintaining it mid-air would…
According to the FAQ[1], they also offer 9.9.9.10, which passes client subnet at the cost of other features. [1] https://www.quad9.net/faq
Besides response time, the next level of comparison is how well geo-DNS-based services (global load balancing, etc.) support these resolvers. AFAIK 8.8.8.8 gives decent results in most places, though I've seen…
I too felt that Spring Boot was a response to the simplicity of Dropwizard. I worked at a place which had two opposing java camps. One was heavily into Spring Boot, the other, Dropwizard. This might not be a fair…