I think you're missing the point. I am not defending a position. I was merely pointing out the irony in trying to force a consensus. Also, there is a difference between thinking that people speaking freely is good for a…
If they have won, they have only won because the game has been given to them. It's clear to see that a lot of their arguments are just reactionary, as Florin_Andrei pointed out.
We believe in freedom of expression, but let's censor/threaten whoever disagrees with us, because their opinions are harmful. We believe in gaining a consensus, but you'd better believe what we say or else.
What current jobs don't require interaction with other humans?
Well it could be real depending on whose definition we're going by. I remember a teacher in school giving us pictures of skyscrapers buried in water. Is that realistic? As for the cause, there is bound to be…
I think you're missing the point. I am not defending a position. I was merely pointing out the irony in trying to force a consensus. Also, there is a difference between thinking that people speaking freely is good for a…
If they have won, they have only won because the game has been given to them. It's clear to see that a lot of their arguments are just reactionary, as Florin_Andrei pointed out.
We believe in freedom of expression, but let's censor/threaten whoever disagrees with us, because their opinions are harmful. We believe in gaining a consensus, but you'd better believe what we say or else.
What current jobs don't require interaction with other humans?
Well it could be real depending on whose definition we're going by. I remember a teacher in school giving us pictures of skyscrapers buried in water. Is that realistic? As for the cause, there is bound to be…