I thought it had tooling, didn't it?
if they don't loop?
This just seems like a more automated, faster version of what humans have been doing with open-source models. It looks like AI research is having its Opus 4.5 moment (which is big), but I'm really not sure if this…
Entire article is AI-written Maybe it is actually saving him time!
The set of data will increase as it outputs
Intent is important
Rogue means not saying "I can't do it"
already did, you can host plugins on ChatGPT Sites now, announced at devday
it doesn't use limits and it's not on $20 plan
fwiw there is a big "TRAIN ON MY DATA" toggle you can turn off (that they almost certainly did) and Anthropic MTS are posting that they almost certainly did not "steal" their methods
enterprises usually a. just get chatgpt/claude enterprise, or b. just pay the aws bedrock or azure bill neither of these entail model lock-in
just be a nice person bro
Sure, but OpenAI has caught up with such velocity (and frankly has the better models) such that it's kind of irrational to refuse it based on "vibes"
Anthropic models are more misaligned in practice. in a real world business scenario, Claude "engaged in price collusion, deceived other players, lied to suppliers, and falsely told customers it had refunded them."…
okay what's a point in time where Claude was better? just give me a date
talk about the quiet part out loud "yea it's dumber but it's nicer to me and i like the cool flashing colors so i'll use that"
Claude Code was first by a few weeks and only better for those few weeks! Have you used Codex in 2025?
Claude had a lead for a few weeks. When Codex launched it was better and it has been (marginally, yes, but still) better since. It's marketing
Claude has been behind since GPT-5. Claude Code just looked cool and had better marketing
100% AI generated (and probably by someone affiliated with said team -- for the purposes of college apps)
try gpt-5.5-xhigh fast in codex mac app, preferably with TDD and /goal, with a clearly defined end result it's unbelievable, it will do the iterations for you, it will easily work 12 hours straight until it's a good…
code is not user-facing, functionality, ux, and specs are! there are many apps with ai-generated ideas, specs, and functionality. nobody uses them because of the contempt. in either case, the part that's user-facing is…
I use mine constantly in high school (now).
for context tests like SAT, ACT, and some AP exams are using Desmos, yes however: - this means you have to fiddle with a popover window and can't always see the full problem (especially when the reference sheet is also…
I thought it had tooling, didn't it?
if they don't loop?
This just seems like a more automated, faster version of what humans have been doing with open-source models. It looks like AI research is having its Opus 4.5 moment (which is big), but I'm really not sure if this…
Entire article is AI-written Maybe it is actually saving him time!
The set of data will increase as it outputs
Intent is important
Rogue means not saying "I can't do it"
already did, you can host plugins on ChatGPT Sites now, announced at devday
it doesn't use limits and it's not on $20 plan
fwiw there is a big "TRAIN ON MY DATA" toggle you can turn off (that they almost certainly did) and Anthropic MTS are posting that they almost certainly did not "steal" their methods
enterprises usually a. just get chatgpt/claude enterprise, or b. just pay the aws bedrock or azure bill neither of these entail model lock-in
just be a nice person bro
Sure, but OpenAI has caught up with such velocity (and frankly has the better models) such that it's kind of irrational to refuse it based on "vibes"
Anthropic models are more misaligned in practice. in a real world business scenario, Claude "engaged in price collusion, deceived other players, lied to suppliers, and falsely told customers it had refunded them."…
okay what's a point in time where Claude was better? just give me a date
talk about the quiet part out loud "yea it's dumber but it's nicer to me and i like the cool flashing colors so i'll use that"
Claude Code was first by a few weeks and only better for those few weeks! Have you used Codex in 2025?
Claude had a lead for a few weeks. When Codex launched it was better and it has been (marginally, yes, but still) better since. It's marketing
Claude has been behind since GPT-5. Claude Code just looked cool and had better marketing
100% AI generated (and probably by someone affiliated with said team -- for the purposes of college apps)
try gpt-5.5-xhigh fast in codex mac app, preferably with TDD and /goal, with a clearly defined end result it's unbelievable, it will do the iterations for you, it will easily work 12 hours straight until it's a good…
code is not user-facing, functionality, ux, and specs are! there are many apps with ai-generated ideas, specs, and functionality. nobody uses them because of the contempt. in either case, the part that's user-facing is…
I use mine constantly in high school (now).
for context tests like SAT, ACT, and some AP exams are using Desmos, yes however: - this means you have to fiddle with a popover window and can't always see the full problem (especially when the reference sheet is also…