[dead]
[flagged]
It's not just a sentence that it made, it redefines the structure of reading itself.
Wikipedia only has facts on it because they're difficult to argue about. Trust me, they would delete facts if they could. It's not a site for smart people.
I'll just say the obvious: Wikipedia admins get it wrong more often than they get it right, and the general process for Wikipedia is obtuse, ignorant, and generally backward, with most of the favor given towards "people…
Because I analyzed the non-game accurately? Grow up and get over yourself not everyone is delusional enough to enjoy spreadsheets.
I have a shorter list: 1. Be Rich 2. Be Attractive if you didn't complete step 1. 3. If you failed to complete steps 1. and 2., don't bother.
This is also an advertisement. I think it's sporting to pay for advertising and not sporting to try and sneak it in on people.
embedded youtube video on an advertisement site how do I unsubscribe from your blog's ads?
What are you sipping on?
This only works in a high-trust society.
The concept of wealth is predicated upon the idea that one may "play at the table in the Casino and win". In reality entry to this system is barred but it only exists in such a way because people believe in the…
I don't buy this personally. The leaks of Peter Thiel's 'Dialog' society demonstrate to me that the bell curve™ (or normal distribution as cool cats refer to it) exists at every level of wealth and society. (Look up the…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_principle I think the Peter principle applies here; what you view as "competent people" are actually beneficiaries of systems, that they themselves can never independently create due…
"Nick pick ahead" I have to ~nitpick~ your mis-phrasing here. ;) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nitpicking
[dead]
[dead]
[flagged]
[flagged]
[flagged]
[flagged]
[flagged]
[flagged]
It's not just a sentence that it made, it redefines the structure of reading itself.
Wikipedia only has facts on it because they're difficult to argue about. Trust me, they would delete facts if they could. It's not a site for smart people.
[flagged]
[flagged]
I'll just say the obvious: Wikipedia admins get it wrong more often than they get it right, and the general process for Wikipedia is obtuse, ignorant, and generally backward, with most of the favor given towards "people…
Because I analyzed the non-game accurately? Grow up and get over yourself not everyone is delusional enough to enjoy spreadsheets.
I have a shorter list: 1. Be Rich 2. Be Attractive if you didn't complete step 1. 3. If you failed to complete steps 1. and 2., don't bother.
This is also an advertisement. I think it's sporting to pay for advertising and not sporting to try and sneak it in on people.
[flagged]
embedded youtube video on an advertisement site how do I unsubscribe from your blog's ads?
What are you sipping on?
This only works in a high-trust society.
The concept of wealth is predicated upon the idea that one may "play at the table in the Casino and win". In reality entry to this system is barred but it only exists in such a way because people believe in the…
I don't buy this personally. The leaks of Peter Thiel's 'Dialog' society demonstrate to me that the bell curve™ (or normal distribution as cool cats refer to it) exists at every level of wealth and society. (Look up the…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_principle I think the Peter principle applies here; what you view as "competent people" are actually beneficiaries of systems, that they themselves can never independently create due…
"Nick pick ahead" I have to ~nitpick~ your mis-phrasing here. ;) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nitpicking