Again, this law is constitutional. http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamdi_v._Rumsfeld
How does this threaten an American citizen's rights? This is lawful under the Constitution.
Which founding fathers were godless?
The Supreme Court has ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all federal courts and over state court cases involving issues of federal law.
This is quite the straw man. I meant free in a legal sense.
Read Article III, Section 1. "The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court."
So it's okay to pick and choose which texts to follow from our Constitution? The Constitution doesn't give Snowden the power to interpret it. It does however give that duty to our federal courts. Should we just ignore…
Shouldn't the interpretation of our Constitution be left to the Supreme Court? I mean, the Constitution explicitly grants the Court those powers.
Again, this law is constitutional. http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamdi_v._Rumsfeld
How does this threaten an American citizen's rights? This is lawful under the Constitution.
Which founding fathers were godless?
The Supreme Court has ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all federal courts and over state court cases involving issues of federal law.
This is quite the straw man. I meant free in a legal sense.
Read Article III, Section 1. "The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court."
So it's okay to pick and choose which texts to follow from our Constitution? The Constitution doesn't give Snowden the power to interpret it. It does however give that duty to our federal courts. Should we just ignore…
Shouldn't the interpretation of our Constitution be left to the Supreme Court? I mean, the Constitution explicitly grants the Court those powers.