2016 and doesnt engage w connectionism, so useless
Like ive explained winning a competition and being slop are totally sympatico Edit: I do think its an inditement of the competition when it happens though -- a better organised competition is going to deliver less slop…
Its pretty clear that in many cases it doesnt need to be better than slop So I think by and large it is
To actually answer your question its perfectly clear in a lot of cases that it is slop and theres some simply reasons why slop can win. 1. Generating ai slop is clearly less intensive than producing a real photograph,…
Can you tell me your reasons for suspecting this likely isn't how we reason, or even a good analogy?
Do you know how you reason? Perhaps you've reified it too much.
Either you used AI or you happen to write like an AI - in either case something to work on. I do think my comment was lazily dismissive so you do have a point but in so far your post is basically just a gripe, I would…
You clearly used AI pretty heavily to write this - so whats the point?
I think "poetry" is a protected term - so personally I don't this thing generates poetry.
Who does the author refer to with 'anonymous stochastic ringleader'? I like the turn of phrase and understand it may be more of a poetic throwaway but I remain a bit uncertain as to what they had in mind.
What does the author mean by 'anonymous stochastic ringleader'
2016 and doesnt engage w connectionism, so useless
Like ive explained winning a competition and being slop are totally sympatico Edit: I do think its an inditement of the competition when it happens though -- a better organised competition is going to deliver less slop…
Its pretty clear that in many cases it doesnt need to be better than slop So I think by and large it is
To actually answer your question its perfectly clear in a lot of cases that it is slop and theres some simply reasons why slop can win. 1. Generating ai slop is clearly less intensive than producing a real photograph,…
Can you tell me your reasons for suspecting this likely isn't how we reason, or even a good analogy?
Do you know how you reason? Perhaps you've reified it too much.
Either you used AI or you happen to write like an AI - in either case something to work on. I do think my comment was lazily dismissive so you do have a point but in so far your post is basically just a gripe, I would…
You clearly used AI pretty heavily to write this - so whats the point?
I think "poetry" is a protected term - so personally I don't this thing generates poetry.
Who does the author refer to with 'anonymous stochastic ringleader'? I like the turn of phrase and understand it may be more of a poetic throwaway but I remain a bit uncertain as to what they had in mind.
What does the author mean by 'anonymous stochastic ringleader'