Can you tell me your reasons for suspecting this likely isn't how we reason, or even a good analogy?
Do you know how you reason? Perhaps you've reified it too much.
Either you used AI or you happen to write like an AI - in either case something to work on. I do think my comment was lazily dismissive so you do have a point but in so far your post is basically just a gripe, I would…
You clearly used AI pretty heavily to write this - so whats the point?
I think "poetry" is a protected term - so personally I don't this thing generates poetry.
Who does the author refer to with 'anonymous stochastic ringleader'? I like the turn of phrase and understand it may be more of a poetic throwaway but I remain a bit uncertain as to what they had in mind.
What does the author mean by 'anonymous stochastic ringleader'
Can you tell me your reasons for suspecting this likely isn't how we reason, or even a good analogy?
Do you know how you reason? Perhaps you've reified it too much.
Either you used AI or you happen to write like an AI - in either case something to work on. I do think my comment was lazily dismissive so you do have a point but in so far your post is basically just a gripe, I would…
You clearly used AI pretty heavily to write this - so whats the point?
I think "poetry" is a protected term - so personally I don't this thing generates poetry.
Who does the author refer to with 'anonymous stochastic ringleader'? I like the turn of phrase and understand it may be more of a poetic throwaway but I remain a bit uncertain as to what they had in mind.
What does the author mean by 'anonymous stochastic ringleader'