There's already a rate limit on pulls. All this does is make that rate limit more inconvenient by making it hourly instead of allowing you to amortize it over 6 hours. 10 per hour is slightly lower than 100 per 6 hours,…
> The average user doesn't even recognize that running a website literally cost electricity that must be paid for. Who pays for it? Who will carry the boats? Running a retail store also has costs associated with it,…
It's not a limitation of the internet, it's a fundamental property of communication. Imagine trying to validate that all letters sent to your company are written by special company-provided typewriters and you would run…
If an endpoint costs a lot to run, implement rate limits and return 429 status codes so callers know that they're calling too often. That endpoint will be expensive regardless of whether it's your own app or a third…
In my personal view, this seems a little overbearing. If you expose an API, and you want to tell a user that they are "unauthorized" to use it, it should return a 401 status code so that the caller knows they're…
> Single English words cannot be trademarked. Um... Apple? Shell? Alphabet? Chevron? Target? Caterpillar? Oracle? Orange?
If all that's missing is 'a nasm compatible assembler', did they try just swapping it out for nasm, which seems to have a readily available alpine package? https://pkgs.alpinelinux.org/package/edge/main/x86/nasm
> Because it often isn't. I don't know about your experience, but in all the teams I've worked in throughout my career the discipline to keep PRs atomic is almost never maintained, and sometimes just doesn't make sense.…
> At the risk of sounding judgemental, I think this preference for always squashing PRs comes from a place of either not understanding atomic commits, not caring about the benefits of them, or just choosing to be lazy.…
Yeah, because no one on Linux or Mac would clone a git repo they just found out about and blindly run the setup scripts listed in the readme. And no one would pipe a script downloaded with wget/curl directly into bash.…
Is this the first Summoning Salt video you've seen? I don't know enough to say that he doesn't use an LLM during his writing process, but I do know that I haven't noticed any appreciable difference between his newer…
Seems like the best way for somebody to get over a bad thing that they did in their past is to be forthright in acknowledging that they did the bad thing, and show through their actions how they've become a better…
> It also allows for much easier reverting of specific changes in case some part of a topic needs removed. I guess I struggle to see where reverting entire commits makes more sense than just deleting the offending code…
That seems like significantly more work for marginal (if any) benefit over just having a single squash commit per PR. I don't think I've ever found myself in a situation where I needed more granularity than the PR level…
> When reviewers look for these logic issues, they often run through the code line-by-line using different inputs and see if any lines cause the code to produce the wrong output. I don't know of anyone that regularly…
When you are charging people extra for the features you're promising will exist in the future, it seems reasonable to call that fraud if you never deliver.
> _and_ charging for early access to an update to make it playable with Yuzu. From my understanding, this part is not true (though it is widely touted). There were third parties that made the necessary fixes to run the…
> Withholding too much is literally required under the law. If you don't withhold enough, at tax time you could be liable for penalties unless you also pay quarterly to make up the difference. You only need to withhold…
> Personally, I think these companies are just stealing copyrighted works, and should be sued for that. It's against the law, it's pretty simple. Is it copyright infringement to count how many times each letter appears…
I assume that an "ATR turboprop" does not count as a commercial jet.
How on earth is it Canon's fault when Apple releases a breaking change?
I would imagine you would call yourself a Software Engineer if what you do for a living is software engineering. I'm not sure that schooling needs to be a factor.
As far as I'm aware, the DMCA doesn't have any sort of exception for archival, but it does have one for software interoperability, which emulators definitely are, regardless of how current the hardware being emulated is.
> (It is true that Yuzu can also play homebrew software. I think the situation would be different if Yuzu was tested exclusively on Homebrew, and only emulated features which homebrew software uses. But then no one…
> Given how much money they were bring in on patrion, it isn't much different than if they tried to make a physical knock off switch that could run switch games. Why would that be a problem? As long as they're not…
There's already a rate limit on pulls. All this does is make that rate limit more inconvenient by making it hourly instead of allowing you to amortize it over 6 hours. 10 per hour is slightly lower than 100 per 6 hours,…
> The average user doesn't even recognize that running a website literally cost electricity that must be paid for. Who pays for it? Who will carry the boats? Running a retail store also has costs associated with it,…
It's not a limitation of the internet, it's a fundamental property of communication. Imagine trying to validate that all letters sent to your company are written by special company-provided typewriters and you would run…
If an endpoint costs a lot to run, implement rate limits and return 429 status codes so callers know that they're calling too often. That endpoint will be expensive regardless of whether it's your own app or a third…
In my personal view, this seems a little overbearing. If you expose an API, and you want to tell a user that they are "unauthorized" to use it, it should return a 401 status code so that the caller knows they're…
> Single English words cannot be trademarked. Um... Apple? Shell? Alphabet? Chevron? Target? Caterpillar? Oracle? Orange?
If all that's missing is 'a nasm compatible assembler', did they try just swapping it out for nasm, which seems to have a readily available alpine package? https://pkgs.alpinelinux.org/package/edge/main/x86/nasm
> Because it often isn't. I don't know about your experience, but in all the teams I've worked in throughout my career the discipline to keep PRs atomic is almost never maintained, and sometimes just doesn't make sense.…
> At the risk of sounding judgemental, I think this preference for always squashing PRs comes from a place of either not understanding atomic commits, not caring about the benefits of them, or just choosing to be lazy.…
Yeah, because no one on Linux or Mac would clone a git repo they just found out about and blindly run the setup scripts listed in the readme. And no one would pipe a script downloaded with wget/curl directly into bash.…
Is this the first Summoning Salt video you've seen? I don't know enough to say that he doesn't use an LLM during his writing process, but I do know that I haven't noticed any appreciable difference between his newer…
Seems like the best way for somebody to get over a bad thing that they did in their past is to be forthright in acknowledging that they did the bad thing, and show through their actions how they've become a better…
> It also allows for much easier reverting of specific changes in case some part of a topic needs removed. I guess I struggle to see where reverting entire commits makes more sense than just deleting the offending code…
That seems like significantly more work for marginal (if any) benefit over just having a single squash commit per PR. I don't think I've ever found myself in a situation where I needed more granularity than the PR level…
> When reviewers look for these logic issues, they often run through the code line-by-line using different inputs and see if any lines cause the code to produce the wrong output. I don't know of anyone that regularly…
When you are charging people extra for the features you're promising will exist in the future, it seems reasonable to call that fraud if you never deliver.
> _and_ charging for early access to an update to make it playable with Yuzu. From my understanding, this part is not true (though it is widely touted). There were third parties that made the necessary fixes to run the…
> Withholding too much is literally required under the law. If you don't withhold enough, at tax time you could be liable for penalties unless you also pay quarterly to make up the difference. You only need to withhold…
> Personally, I think these companies are just stealing copyrighted works, and should be sued for that. It's against the law, it's pretty simple. Is it copyright infringement to count how many times each letter appears…
I assume that an "ATR turboprop" does not count as a commercial jet.
How on earth is it Canon's fault when Apple releases a breaking change?
I would imagine you would call yourself a Software Engineer if what you do for a living is software engineering. I'm not sure that schooling needs to be a factor.
As far as I'm aware, the DMCA doesn't have any sort of exception for archival, but it does have one for software interoperability, which emulators definitely are, regardless of how current the hardware being emulated is.
> (It is true that Yuzu can also play homebrew software. I think the situation would be different if Yuzu was tested exclusively on Homebrew, and only emulated features which homebrew software uses. But then no one…
> Given how much money they were bring in on patrion, it isn't much different than if they tried to make a physical knock off switch that could run switch games. Why would that be a problem? As long as they're not…