Just a couple more trillion and 6 more months!
> I believe that LLM's are making traditional programming obsolete. In fact there isn't any doubt in my mind. Is this what AI psychosis looks like? How can anyone that is a half decent programmer actually believe that…
Ah, so no longer misinformation?
Go look at the 40k failing CI/CD runs on the famous cursor browser.
AI misinformation? Please do provide some examples. Your whole history is AI psychosis btw, seek help.
The one that cursor used to build their famous browser.
I think the author forgot that code has to compile and be useful. And how much is technical debt worth?
Has there been any good and useful software created with LLMs or any increase in software quality that we can actually look at? So far it's just AI doom posting, hype bloggers that haven't shipped anything, anecdotes…
Because who cares about correct and compilable code, any code will do!
A non-deterministic, slow, pay to use, compiler for a language that is not precise enough for software. What an amazing abstraction!
If you're asking me to define a very clear bar, it's obvious nothing cleared it. Anything that proves that LLMs increase software quality. Any software built with an LLM that is actually in production, survives…
Something tells me a non-deterministic code generator won't be the solution to this problem.
> Every major tech company is using AI for a significant % of their code It shows, increased outages, increased vulnerabilities, windows failing to boot, windows task bar is still react native and barely works. And I…
It really shouldn't be this hard to just provide one piece of evidence. Is anecdotes of toy internal greenfield projects that could probably be built with a drag and drop no-code editor really the best from this LLM…
> every company from seed stage to unicorns are heavily using claude code, cursor, and the like to produce software > The difference in pace of shipping with and without AI assistance is staggering. Lets back up these…
I'll believe it when I start seeing examples of good and useful software being created with LLMs or some increase in software quality. So far it's just AI doom posting, hype bloggers that haven't shipped anything,…
Just a couple more trillion dollars, we are so close!
What is he missing? Do you have anything quantitative other than an AI marketing blog or an anecdote?
I heard that about NFTs not long ago.
Where is all the amazing software and/or improvements in software quality that is supposed to be coming from this revolution? So far the only output is the "How I use AI blogs", AI marketing blogs, more CVEs, more…
Speaking of obnoxious
The trick to not be confused is to read more than the title of the article.
Do you think this was guided by a low quality Anthropic developer? You can give a developer the GCC test suite and have them build the compiler backwards, which is how this was done. They literally brute forced it, most…
100k lines of clean, bug free, optimized, and vulnerability free code or 100k lines of outsourced slop? Two very different price points.
Some people care more about compiler speed than the correctness? I would love to meet these imaginary people that are fine with a compiler that is straight up broken. Emitting working code is the baseline, not some…
Just a couple more trillion and 6 more months!
> I believe that LLM's are making traditional programming obsolete. In fact there isn't any doubt in my mind. Is this what AI psychosis looks like? How can anyone that is a half decent programmer actually believe that…
Ah, so no longer misinformation?
Go look at the 40k failing CI/CD runs on the famous cursor browser.
AI misinformation? Please do provide some examples. Your whole history is AI psychosis btw, seek help.
The one that cursor used to build their famous browser.
I think the author forgot that code has to compile and be useful. And how much is technical debt worth?
Has there been any good and useful software created with LLMs or any increase in software quality that we can actually look at? So far it's just AI doom posting, hype bloggers that haven't shipped anything, anecdotes…
Because who cares about correct and compilable code, any code will do!
A non-deterministic, slow, pay to use, compiler for a language that is not precise enough for software. What an amazing abstraction!
If you're asking me to define a very clear bar, it's obvious nothing cleared it. Anything that proves that LLMs increase software quality. Any software built with an LLM that is actually in production, survives…
Something tells me a non-deterministic code generator won't be the solution to this problem.
> Every major tech company is using AI for a significant % of their code It shows, increased outages, increased vulnerabilities, windows failing to boot, windows task bar is still react native and barely works. And I…
It really shouldn't be this hard to just provide one piece of evidence. Is anecdotes of toy internal greenfield projects that could probably be built with a drag and drop no-code editor really the best from this LLM…
> every company from seed stage to unicorns are heavily using claude code, cursor, and the like to produce software > The difference in pace of shipping with and without AI assistance is staggering. Lets back up these…
I'll believe it when I start seeing examples of good and useful software being created with LLMs or some increase in software quality. So far it's just AI doom posting, hype bloggers that haven't shipped anything,…
Just a couple more trillion dollars, we are so close!
What is he missing? Do you have anything quantitative other than an AI marketing blog or an anecdote?
I heard that about NFTs not long ago.
Where is all the amazing software and/or improvements in software quality that is supposed to be coming from this revolution? So far the only output is the "How I use AI blogs", AI marketing blogs, more CVEs, more…
Speaking of obnoxious
The trick to not be confused is to read more than the title of the article.
Do you think this was guided by a low quality Anthropic developer? You can give a developer the GCC test suite and have them build the compiler backwards, which is how this was done. They literally brute forced it, most…
100k lines of clean, bug free, optimized, and vulnerability free code or 100k lines of outsourced slop? Two very different price points.
Some people care more about compiler speed than the correctness? I would love to meet these imaginary people that are fine with a compiler that is straight up broken. Emitting working code is the baseline, not some…