>the kid We're talking about millions of people. When you get to scale that large, you are talking about society and culture, not individual choices. To have millions of people change their behavior is to change the…
>But must the standard for safety be higher than existing human drivers Yes. Imagine that it crashes with the same average incidence rate as humans. Humans are imperfect creatures. They break the law. Let's even say…
Your rant makes no sense. I flip a coin 100 times and it comes up tails 99 times. You are basically saying that asking "Is the coin more likely to come up tails" isn't a real scientific question. That's just silly.
>the kid We're talking about millions of people. When you get to scale that large, you are talking about society and culture, not individual choices. To have millions of people change their behavior is to change the…
>But must the standard for safety be higher than existing human drivers Yes. Imagine that it crashes with the same average incidence rate as humans. Humans are imperfect creatures. They break the law. Let's even say…
Your rant makes no sense. I flip a coin 100 times and it comes up tails 99 times. You are basically saying that asking "Is the coin more likely to come up tails" isn't a real scientific question. That's just silly.