That would be fully compliant with the DNS spec. (I run such a service, test 2+2.op.dyn.bortzmeyer.fr/TXT or paris.now.weather.dyn.bortzmeyer.fr/TXT.)
What makes you tell it looks like DNS poisoning? It if were DNS poisoning, some resolvers would have been poisoned but not all, while, here, everybody saw the attacker's IP address.…
No, nothing indicates it was a poisoning attack. Please check the facts. http://www.bortzmeyer.org/observations-wikileaks.html
EuroDNS is a registrar. Are you sure you are not mixing registry and registrar ?
Apparently, .np has no registrar at all but a direct relationship registrant<->regsitry.
I certainly hope there is no foreign law forcing how a sovereign country must manage its domain names.
Since it is a ccTLD, it is a nepalese internal matter and I don't see why ICANN should be involved at all. Ask local authorities, write to the governement, raise the issue in the local Internet community, etc.
That would be fully compliant with the DNS spec. (I run such a service, test 2+2.op.dyn.bortzmeyer.fr/TXT or paris.now.weather.dyn.bortzmeyer.fr/TXT.)
What makes you tell it looks like DNS poisoning? It if were DNS poisoning, some resolvers would have been poisoned but not all, while, here, everybody saw the attacker's IP address.…
No, nothing indicates it was a poisoning attack. Please check the facts. http://www.bortzmeyer.org/observations-wikileaks.html
EuroDNS is a registrar. Are you sure you are not mixing registry and registrar ?
Apparently, .np has no registrar at all but a direct relationship registrant<->regsitry.
I certainly hope there is no foreign law forcing how a sovereign country must manage its domain names.
Since it is a ccTLD, it is a nepalese internal matter and I don't see why ICANN should be involved at all. Ask local authorities, write to the governement, raise the issue in the local Internet community, etc.