> In reality the modal life expectancy of adults (most common age of death other than 0) has been pretty stable in the 70s-80s range for most of human history- the low average was almost entirely due to infant…
The CEO's, it's pretty clear.
Do you have evidence for your assertion? Of what significance is the ratio of highest to lowest paid employee? Shareholders of a particular company pay CEOs, not whoever "we" is. Here is evidence that claim CEOs produce…
CTRL-F "price" 0 results
I recommend the book "More Money Than God" which studies the history of hedge funds and in the end suggests that successful hedge funds are not simply statistical survivors.
Mandelbrot did not think the markets were random. He explicitly rejected the Efficient Market Hypothesis. http://www.amazon.com/Mis-behavior-Markets-Benoit-Mandelbrot...
Do you disagree that secrets during war are necessary?
http://www.tnellen.com/cybereng/harrison.html
People don't like her because they disagree with her conclusions and what they assume are her methods. In order to understand her methods you must understand her epistemology. This requires reading her nonfiction…
> In reality the modal life expectancy of adults (most common age of death other than 0) has been pretty stable in the 70s-80s range for most of human history- the low average was almost entirely due to infant…
The CEO's, it's pretty clear.
Do you have evidence for your assertion? Of what significance is the ratio of highest to lowest paid employee? Shareholders of a particular company pay CEOs, not whoever "we" is. Here is evidence that claim CEOs produce…
CTRL-F "price" 0 results
I recommend the book "More Money Than God" which studies the history of hedge funds and in the end suggests that successful hedge funds are not simply statistical survivors.
Mandelbrot did not think the markets were random. He explicitly rejected the Efficient Market Hypothesis. http://www.amazon.com/Mis-behavior-Markets-Benoit-Mandelbrot...
Do you disagree that secrets during war are necessary?
http://www.tnellen.com/cybereng/harrison.html
People don't like her because they disagree with her conclusions and what they assume are her methods. In order to understand her methods you must understand her epistemology. This requires reading her nonfiction…