I am sure I can come out with better facts that will blow your mind about Microsoft than those presented in this blog. I do like Microsoft, Apple and every company that has made or still making difference in our…
Being 99% percent wrong in research is good. Reporting negative results is very important, provided you have an acceptable argument of the reason you pursued a specific idea.
Santorum looks both gay and addicted to porn.
I am not vouching for MS nor Google. I don't take sides. All what I am interested in is to know wether the examples given about google were valid or not.
So what? The most important is the content. Did they give wrong examples about Google? This is similar to when giving Coca-Cola as an example of how bad soda drinks are. It does not mean that Pepsi is good.
Too much space between "windows 8" and the actual window.
You better have stronger reasons than those presented in the article to doom Wikipedia to be a "failure" The problems stated by the author are valid however they are solvable. Definitely, Wikipedia must have a scoring…
That's assuming the traffic is only 140 characters per tweet. What about html/TCPIP overhead, images, clicking links. I guess you need a LightTwitter application.
Those questions are valid if someone is trying to build the next Facebook. However, I think a person should work on important problems (not necessary hard, but important). And most importantly to like your work to reach…
I don't mean he got lucky. But as a programmer, I believe that there are far more success stories to learn from than that of facebook.
Seeing Facebook or Mark Zukerberg to be at the top of the success spectrum is really disturbing, much like when most business students see Donald Trump as a smart businessman.
I sucked.
I don't like the fact that people either love Microsoft or don't. The same applies to Google and Apple. As developers, we should always objectively question all big companies and give them credit when they deserve it.…
I am sure I can come out with better facts that will blow your mind about Microsoft than those presented in this blog. I do like Microsoft, Apple and every company that has made or still making difference in our…
Being 99% percent wrong in research is good. Reporting negative results is very important, provided you have an acceptable argument of the reason you pursued a specific idea.
Santorum looks both gay and addicted to porn.
I am not vouching for MS nor Google. I don't take sides. All what I am interested in is to know wether the examples given about google were valid or not.
So what? The most important is the content. Did they give wrong examples about Google? This is similar to when giving Coca-Cola as an example of how bad soda drinks are. It does not mean that Pepsi is good.
Too much space between "windows 8" and the actual window.
You better have stronger reasons than those presented in the article to doom Wikipedia to be a "failure" The problems stated by the author are valid however they are solvable. Definitely, Wikipedia must have a scoring…
That's assuming the traffic is only 140 characters per tweet. What about html/TCPIP overhead, images, clicking links. I guess you need a LightTwitter application.
Those questions are valid if someone is trying to build the next Facebook. However, I think a person should work on important problems (not necessary hard, but important). And most importantly to like your work to reach…
I don't mean he got lucky. But as a programmer, I believe that there are far more success stories to learn from than that of facebook.
Seeing Facebook or Mark Zukerberg to be at the top of the success spectrum is really disturbing, much like when most business students see Donald Trump as a smart businessman.
I sucked.
I don't like the fact that people either love Microsoft or don't. The same applies to Google and Apple. As developers, we should always objectively question all big companies and give them credit when they deserve it.…