How do you write a grant for that though? "I plan to prompt Claude until it eventually spits out an answer"?
Yes, believe it or not, Christians have more than one crazy belief. There's an entire book full of them.
How could you possibly know if it has potential or not? Sounds like AI psychosis setting in.
Christians don't believe they're made in the image of God? That's news to me.
Science has proven that the earth wasn't created by a magical fairy 6000 years ago, yes. There's very little doubt about that among educated people.
Its only a possibility if you reject modern science.
Sure if you think that AI spiraling out of control is equally as likely as a magical fairy in the cosmos.
It's not nearly as annoying as being tricked into reading them.
Both ways involve sophistry. If you don't like dirty tricks, statistics isn't for you.
Stock art food doesn't usually look unappetizing and bizarre.
Memory already declines with age. AI slop threatens to warp those memories further.
I understand that internet adoption wasn't universal in 2000. You're saying they refused to get it because photos took too long to load. That's an absolutely absurd statement.
You haven't made any specific claims to engage with, just vague polemics.
The amount of strawmen and false equivalencies here is crazy. I bet you can't name one person who refused to get Internet because photos don't load fast enough.
Cute phrase, but that's not how it's used.
Another sweeping claim that doesn't actually say anything. How is it the "exact opposite"?
The Paris Accords have very specific policy goals. Your criticism is incoherent.
A data breach could leak into search engine results, sure.
You still haven't checked the ToS: "use automated scripts to collect information from or otherwise interact with the Services" — this covers the entire scraping operation. "make unauthorised copies, modify, adapt,…
This is a data breach. The user only gave TikTok permission to use the videos according to the ToS. And considering the majority of TikTok users are children, I think it's hard to justify morally, even if you could make…
Any company could potentially be hacked, so by that standard all data is public. And no, the ToS is legally binding on the company as well.
What is "public" data? It admits to violating the ToS.
This is the intelligence of the average American voter. No wonder we got Trump.
We'd still be living in caves if there weren't people like that.
Yes, the medicalization of normal human experiences is lamentable. But grant money doesn't appear without diseases for pharma to treat.
How do you write a grant for that though? "I plan to prompt Claude until it eventually spits out an answer"?
Yes, believe it or not, Christians have more than one crazy belief. There's an entire book full of them.
How could you possibly know if it has potential or not? Sounds like AI psychosis setting in.
Christians don't believe they're made in the image of God? That's news to me.
Science has proven that the earth wasn't created by a magical fairy 6000 years ago, yes. There's very little doubt about that among educated people.
Its only a possibility if you reject modern science.
Sure if you think that AI spiraling out of control is equally as likely as a magical fairy in the cosmos.
It's not nearly as annoying as being tricked into reading them.
Both ways involve sophistry. If you don't like dirty tricks, statistics isn't for you.
Stock art food doesn't usually look unappetizing and bizarre.
Memory already declines with age. AI slop threatens to warp those memories further.
I understand that internet adoption wasn't universal in 2000. You're saying they refused to get it because photos took too long to load. That's an absolutely absurd statement.
You haven't made any specific claims to engage with, just vague polemics.
The amount of strawmen and false equivalencies here is crazy. I bet you can't name one person who refused to get Internet because photos don't load fast enough.
Cute phrase, but that's not how it's used.
Another sweeping claim that doesn't actually say anything. How is it the "exact opposite"?
The Paris Accords have very specific policy goals. Your criticism is incoherent.
A data breach could leak into search engine results, sure.
You still haven't checked the ToS: "use automated scripts to collect information from or otherwise interact with the Services" — this covers the entire scraping operation. "make unauthorised copies, modify, adapt,…
This is a data breach. The user only gave TikTok permission to use the videos according to the ToS. And considering the majority of TikTok users are children, I think it's hard to justify morally, even if you could make…
Any company could potentially be hacked, so by that standard all data is public. And no, the ToS is legally binding on the company as well.
What is "public" data? It admits to violating the ToS.
This is the intelligence of the average American voter. No wonder we got Trump.
We'd still be living in caves if there weren't people like that.
Yes, the medicalization of normal human experiences is lamentable. But grant money doesn't appear without diseases for pharma to treat.