Sounds like you just want to write GCode? There are some helpers to make it a little less tedious, like FullControllGcode. Gcode, especially for printers, is really 2 commands, G0 and G1, so writing your own helper is…
Have a look at this: https://opg.optica.org/ol/abstract.cfm?uri=ol-47-5-1279 Matches 100% what you're saying: use low intensity uv to write the spatial area you want to solidify, and when you're done flood cure it all…
For me, it would be nim. A single language that can run on all sidesof the stack, great to write in and ~fast compile times. It helps that I have been toying with it for years, but it's definitely the language I enjoy…
Seeing as one of the main users of nim is developing an ethereum client (https://nimbus.team/) I don't see why it's a bad thing to accept BTC too.
> no interpreter Try running `nim secret` on the command line, it's not perfect but it's enough to play around a bit.
Sounds like you just want to write GCode? There are some helpers to make it a little less tedious, like FullControllGcode. Gcode, especially for printers, is really 2 commands, G0 and G1, so writing your own helper is…
Have a look at this: https://opg.optica.org/ol/abstract.cfm?uri=ol-47-5-1279 Matches 100% what you're saying: use low intensity uv to write the spatial area you want to solidify, and when you're done flood cure it all…
For me, it would be nim. A single language that can run on all sidesof the stack, great to write in and ~fast compile times. It helps that I have been toying with it for years, but it's definitely the language I enjoy…
Seeing as one of the main users of nim is developing an ethereum client (https://nimbus.team/) I don't see why it's a bad thing to accept BTC too.
> no interpreter Try running `nim secret` on the command line, it's not perfect but it's enough to play around a bit.