Thank you!
Yes, but that's not what I asked about.
>MXNet can consume as little as 4 GB of memory when serving deep networks with as many as 1000 layers. So perhaps I'm not well versed enough in deep learning, but does this mean that they solved the vanishing gradient…
Thank you!
Yes, but that's not what I asked about.
>MXNet can consume as little as 4 GB of memory when serving deep networks with as many as 1000 layers. So perhaps I'm not well versed enough in deep learning, but does this mean that they solved the vanishing gradient…