No one claimed the AI "is so smart" - it's another tool in their kit. The article clearly conveys that the potential is a useful way to augment human-led research by providing a way of quickly processing large datasets…
I don't think it's phrased to correlate the second outcome dependent on the first. That part of the article was referring to the racer regressing to their mean. With the assumption that they overperform in their first…
Are you really wondering their intent, or did you just phrase your question to point out the implication of their comment?
No one claimed the AI "is so smart" - it's another tool in their kit. The article clearly conveys that the potential is a useful way to augment human-led research by providing a way of quickly processing large datasets…
I don't think it's phrased to correlate the second outcome dependent on the first. That part of the article was referring to the racer regressing to their mean. With the assumption that they overperform in their first…
Are you really wondering their intent, or did you just phrase your question to point out the implication of their comment?