> I’d rather go into a real shop anyway You’re assuming that scams don’t make their way into regular distributors as they try to cut corners and maintain competitiveness. You already see established brands lower the…
You vastly overestimate the possibility that this news makes it into the mind of fliers and that they actually understand the consequences. Government says it’s ok, so it must be ok. That’s all people think.
That’s what you get when you fire the last actual mappers and just leave developers to keep it running. Google thrives on data quantity, not on quality.
More constructive comments please. What does this mean?
If you don’t have a spoon you probably should get one. I don’t think you can cook without at least 1 utensil, unless you want to stir with your fingers.
Article mode isn't perfect and not compatible with non-articles. Markdown forces content to be just content. > would have to be restricted not to include any html tags The point of this would be to deliver pure content,…
This specific attack could also be easily mitigated by dictating your passwords instead.
I really wish we could have browser “Accept: text/markdown” for raw documents, but that boat sailed the moment we got CSS.
Finally I read my sentiment online. We don't need clicks nor pointer events, we need high-level “visit” event.
Same boat. My blood pressure increased just reading your comment. The web is run by a bunch of amateurs who don’t know the single core concept of the web: links.
> Which is more attractive, and by how much? What is the scale? No scale, yet we have plenty of beauty contests, so I'd start there for an answer. Humans are regularly compared to others. We have different tastes but,…
> it's not offensively bad either In your opinion. W3fools only pulled an “it’s ok now bro, don’t sue us” update. Anytime I give it a go, I’m still presented with inaccurate and harmfully incomplete results. Want to…
That’s why I said “good looking” and “physical attraction” rather than generically “beautiful”. No doubt people can be “beautiful in person” but still “objectively ugly”
The difference is that Microsoft did not sell computers and did not sue anyone trying to run their OS on non-Microsoft hardware. Safari can only be run on Apple machines manufactured by Apple.
To be fair, you’re often punished for clicking No (it takes longer, may cause a reload), so you’d need a very good reason to not click Yes.
IE was different things to different people. To developers, IE was the browser for which you had to spend hours debugging issues. Sounds like Safari to me. Considering you have to buy a whole device to use Safari, I’d…
Dear user, No. Unfortunately these patterns work great so they will never stop. As more dark patterns are “discovered”, we’ll see the web becoming more of a dump. You see it every day, successful websites and socials…
I don’t think that works with eval code because it doesn’t have a file:0:0 address
Happy to see neither one works on Safari. One says "no sites visited" and the other "both sites visited" even in incognito.
It mentions 2 petabytes of data per month, plus compute for a trillion requests per month. It sounds like all kinds of optimizations were made so probably it can’t be much cheaper. My guess is that the “tens of…
> What is the advantage to the customer here? I currently have 5 eSIMs installed on my phone and I can switch at anytime without having to find/carry the SIM cards. Also in theory if I lose my phone I can just download…
> it quite often can take 24-48 hours for your physical SIM to activate In my world, I land in an airport, purchase a SIM card and it works before I leave the airport (or the operator’s desk). It’s often that way with…
To be fair, all the interactions were sanitized with 40% alcohol.
This is a “Dropbox is just a pretty rsync”-level comment
> > Not everything needs to be a damn unicorn. > More people needs to understand this. I sounds more like neither one of you has had that choice. Most people, given the chance, would rather add a zero to their savings…
> I’d rather go into a real shop anyway You’re assuming that scams don’t make their way into regular distributors as they try to cut corners and maintain competitiveness. You already see established brands lower the…
You vastly overestimate the possibility that this news makes it into the mind of fliers and that they actually understand the consequences. Government says it’s ok, so it must be ok. That’s all people think.
That’s what you get when you fire the last actual mappers and just leave developers to keep it running. Google thrives on data quantity, not on quality.
More constructive comments please. What does this mean?
If you don’t have a spoon you probably should get one. I don’t think you can cook without at least 1 utensil, unless you want to stir with your fingers.
Article mode isn't perfect and not compatible with non-articles. Markdown forces content to be just content. > would have to be restricted not to include any html tags The point of this would be to deliver pure content,…
This specific attack could also be easily mitigated by dictating your passwords instead.
I really wish we could have browser “Accept: text/markdown” for raw documents, but that boat sailed the moment we got CSS.
Finally I read my sentiment online. We don't need clicks nor pointer events, we need high-level “visit” event.
Same boat. My blood pressure increased just reading your comment. The web is run by a bunch of amateurs who don’t know the single core concept of the web: links.
> Which is more attractive, and by how much? What is the scale? No scale, yet we have plenty of beauty contests, so I'd start there for an answer. Humans are regularly compared to others. We have different tastes but,…
> it's not offensively bad either In your opinion. W3fools only pulled an “it’s ok now bro, don’t sue us” update. Anytime I give it a go, I’m still presented with inaccurate and harmfully incomplete results. Want to…
That’s why I said “good looking” and “physical attraction” rather than generically “beautiful”. No doubt people can be “beautiful in person” but still “objectively ugly”
The difference is that Microsoft did not sell computers and did not sue anyone trying to run their OS on non-Microsoft hardware. Safari can only be run on Apple machines manufactured by Apple.
To be fair, you’re often punished for clicking No (it takes longer, may cause a reload), so you’d need a very good reason to not click Yes.
IE was different things to different people. To developers, IE was the browser for which you had to spend hours debugging issues. Sounds like Safari to me. Considering you have to buy a whole device to use Safari, I’d…
Dear user, No. Unfortunately these patterns work great so they will never stop. As more dark patterns are “discovered”, we’ll see the web becoming more of a dump. You see it every day, successful websites and socials…
I don’t think that works with eval code because it doesn’t have a file:0:0 address
Happy to see neither one works on Safari. One says "no sites visited" and the other "both sites visited" even in incognito.
It mentions 2 petabytes of data per month, plus compute for a trillion requests per month. It sounds like all kinds of optimizations were made so probably it can’t be much cheaper. My guess is that the “tens of…
> What is the advantage to the customer here? I currently have 5 eSIMs installed on my phone and I can switch at anytime without having to find/carry the SIM cards. Also in theory if I lose my phone I can just download…
> it quite often can take 24-48 hours for your physical SIM to activate In my world, I land in an airport, purchase a SIM card and it works before I leave the airport (or the operator’s desk). It’s often that way with…
To be fair, all the interactions were sanitized with 40% alcohol.
This is a “Dropbox is just a pretty rsync”-level comment
> > Not everything needs to be a damn unicorn. > More people needs to understand this. I sounds more like neither one of you has had that choice. Most people, given the chance, would rather add a zero to their savings…