Insanely useful?
> Personally, I have always found it important to actually understand the things I am using. This article is aimed at readers who do find understanding the constructions they use important.
7. any explanation why it would be caused by complexity of everyday life?
I am glad I am not the only one against this. Especially iOS developers seem to love to put Emoji in their tooling and git repos, but that's just my experience.
Except if that add on blocks Google's precious ads
Is there a non-paywalled version?
> People are not blindly throwing money at every .com IPO that comes out. Now it's ICOs...
This, and the earlier you start the better.
I wonder why they chose to use (yet another) crypto currency for this.
Not surprisingly so if you've worked with Android's Camera(2) APIs
The future is now
I've used a similar trick to pretend I was 18+ on certain websites in the past, have never had any issues with it.
What are the ratings based on? What are the criteria to receive a ++ rating?
Ah interesting, I hadn't thought of those use cases.
Is there any reason not to use a singular field for this? It seems so much simpler to just give the user one input field and it would cover all scenarios.
>A VPN for People Who Don’t Know What V.P.N. Stands For I don't think their target audience includes those people (privacy minded folks.)
And now you aren't able to use Skype for anything anymore :p
Assuming he is going to have children
Do you happen to know why that was perceived as worse? If I understand correctly the difference would be that you'd have to write (i * sizeof(char)) vs. (sizeof(char[i]))? Personally I'd even prefer the former.
Insanely useful?
> Personally, I have always found it important to actually understand the things I am using. This article is aimed at readers who do find understanding the constructions they use important.
7. any explanation why it would be caused by complexity of everyday life?
I am glad I am not the only one against this. Especially iOS developers seem to love to put Emoji in their tooling and git repos, but that's just my experience.
Except if that add on blocks Google's precious ads
Is there a non-paywalled version?
> People are not blindly throwing money at every .com IPO that comes out. Now it's ICOs...
This, and the earlier you start the better.
I wonder why they chose to use (yet another) crypto currency for this.
Not surprisingly so if you've worked with Android's Camera(2) APIs
The future is now
I've used a similar trick to pretend I was 18+ on certain websites in the past, have never had any issues with it.
What are the ratings based on? What are the criteria to receive a ++ rating?
Ah interesting, I hadn't thought of those use cases.
Is there any reason not to use a singular field for this? It seems so much simpler to just give the user one input field and it would cover all scenarios.
>A VPN for People Who Don’t Know What V.P.N. Stands For I don't think their target audience includes those people (privacy minded folks.)
And now you aren't able to use Skype for anything anymore :p
Assuming he is going to have children
Do you happen to know why that was perceived as worse? If I understand correctly the difference would be that you'd have to write (i * sizeof(char)) vs. (sizeof(char[i]))? Personally I'd even prefer the former.